12.07.2015 Views

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

62 Mass- and current-quadrupole radiationdipole, or momentum part of the field, which is also part of the non-wave solution.Our gauge transformation has incorporat<strong>ed</strong> a Lorentz transformation that has putus into the rest frame of the source.) The time-dependent part of the field is nowpurely spatial, transverse (because everything is multipli<strong>ed</strong> by ⊥), and traceless(as can be verifi<strong>ed</strong> by explicit calculation).The expression for the spatial part of the field actually does not depend onthe trace of S jk , as can be seen by constructing the trace-free part of the tensor,defin<strong>ed</strong> as:˜S jk = S jk − 1 3 δ jk S l l. (6.24)In fact, it is more conventional to use the mass moment here instead of the stress,so we also define˜M jk = M jk − 1 3 δ jk Ml l , ˜S jk = 1 d 2 ˜M jk2 dt 2 . (6.25)In terms of ˜M the far field is¯h TTij = 2 (⊥ ik ⊥ jl ¨˜M kl + 1 r2 ⊥ij ¨˜M )kl n l n k . (6.26)This is the usual formula for the mass-quadrupole field. In textbooks the notationis somewhat different than we have adopt<strong>ed</strong> here. In particular, our tensor ˜Mis what is call<strong>ed</strong> I– in Misner et al (1973) and Schutz (1985). It is the basis ofmost gravitational-wave source estimates. We have deriv<strong>ed</strong> it only in the contextof lineariz<strong>ed</strong> theory, but remarkably its form is identical if we go to the post-Newtonian approximation, where the gravitational <strong>waves</strong> are a perturbation ofthe Newtonian spacetime rather than of flat spacetime.Given this powerful formula, it is important to try to interpret it andunderstand it as fully as possible. One obvious conclusion is that the dominantsource of radiation, at least in the slow-motion limit, is the second tim<strong>ed</strong>erivativeof the second moment of the mass density T 00 (the mass-quadrupolemoment). This is a very important difference between gravitational <strong>waves</strong>and electromagnetism, in which the most important source is the electricdipole.In our case the mass-dipole term is not able to radiate because it isconstant, reflecting conservation of the linear momentum of the source. Inelectromagnetism, however, if the dipole term is absent for some reason (allcharges positive, for example) then the quadrupole term dominates and it looksvery similar to equation (6.26).6.2.3 Radiation patterns relat<strong>ed</strong> to the motion of sourcesThe projection operators in equation (6.26) show that the radiative field istransverse, as we expect. However, the form of equation (6.26) hides two equallyimportant messages:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!