12.07.2015 Views

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

56 Waves and energyFinally, what is of the most interest is the energy density as a fraction of theclosure or critical cosmological density, given by the Hubble constant H 0 asϱ c = 3H0 2/8π. The resulting ratio is the symbol gw( f ) that we met in theprevious lecture: gw ( f ) = 32π 3f 3 | ¯h( f )| 2 . (5.21)5.3.3 Other approaches3H 2 0We finish this lecture by observing that there is no unique approach to definingenergy for gravitational radiation or inde<strong>ed</strong> for any solution of Einstein’sequations. Historically this has been one of the most difficult areas for physiciststo get to grips with. In the textbooks you will find discussions of pseudotensors, ofenergy measur<strong>ed</strong> at null infinity and at spacelike infinity, of Noether theorems andformulae for energy, and so on. None of these are worse than we have present<strong>ed</strong>here, and in fact all of them are now known to be consistent with one another, ifone does not ask them to do too much. In particular, if one wants only to localizethe energy of a gravitational wave to a region of the size of a wavelength, andif the <strong>waves</strong> have short wavelength compar<strong>ed</strong> to the background curvature scale,then pseudotensors will give the same energy as the one we have defin<strong>ed</strong> here.Similarly, if one takes the energy flux defin<strong>ed</strong> here and evaluates it at null infinity,one gets the so-call<strong>ed</strong> Bondi flux, which was deriv<strong>ed</strong> by H Bondi in one of thepioneering steps in the understanding of gravitational radiation. Many of theseissues are discuss<strong>ed</strong> in the Schutz–Sorkin paper referr<strong>ed</strong> to earlier [23].5.4 Exercises for chapter 5(e)In the notes above we give the general gauge transformationh µν → h µν − ξ µ;ν − ξ ν;µ .Use the formula for the derivation of Einstein’s equations from an actionprinciple,δI = 1 ∫ √ δ(R −g)h µν d 4 x16π δg µνwithδ(R √ −g)=−G µν√ −g,δg µνbut insert a pure gauge h µν . Argue that since this is merely a coordinatetransformation, the action should be invariant. Integrate the variation of theaction to prove the contact<strong>ed</strong> Bianchi identityG µν ,ν = 0.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!