12.07.2015 Views

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The physics of resonant mass detectors 37small noise in a large bandwidth (∼1000 Hz) near f 0 (note that this band ismuch larger than f Q). Today typical bandwidths of realizable amplifiersare 1 Hz, but in the very near future it is hop<strong>ed</strong> to extend these to 10 Hz, andeventually to 100 Hz.• Quantum limit. According to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, the zeropointvibrations of a bar with a frequency of 1 kHz have rms amplitude〈δl 2 〉 1 2quant =( )1Ð 2∼ 4 × 10 −21 m.2π MfThis is bigger than the expect<strong>ed</strong> signal, and comparable to the thermal limitover 1 ms. It represents the accuracy with which one can measure theamplitude of vibration of the bar. So as soon as current detectors improvetheir thermal limits, they will run into the quantum limit, which must beovercome before a signal at 10 −21 can be seen with such a detector. Oneway to overcome this limit is by increasing the size of the detector and evenby making it spherical. This increases its mass dramatically, pushing thequantum limit down below 10 −21 .Another way around the quantum limit is to avoid measuring δl, but insteadto measure other observables. After all, the goal is to infer the gravitationalwaveamplitude, not to measure the state of vibration of the bar. It is possibleto define a pair of conjugate observables that have the property that one ofthem can be measur<strong>ed</strong> arbitrarily accurately repeat<strong>ed</strong>ly, so that the resultinginaccuracy of knowing the conjugate variable’s value does not disturb thefirst variable’s value. Then, if the first variable responds to the gravitationalwave, the gravitational wave may be measur<strong>ed</strong> accurately, even though thefull state of the bar is poorly known. This method is call<strong>ed</strong> ‘back reactionevasion’. The theory was develop<strong>ed</strong> in a classic paper by Caves et al [8].However, no viable schemes to do this have been demonstrat<strong>ed</strong> for bardetectors so far.3.3.1 New bar detectors and their capabilitiesResonant-mass detectors are limit<strong>ed</strong> by properties of materials and, as we havejust explain<strong>ed</strong>, they have their best sensitivity in a narrow band around theirresonant frequency. However, they can usefully explore higher frequencies (above500 Hz), where the interferometer noise curves are rising (see earlier figures).From the beginning, bars were design<strong>ed</strong> to detect bursts. If the burstradiation carries significant energy in the bar’s bandwidth, then the bar can dowell. Standard assumptions about gravitational collapse suggest a signal with abroad spectrum to 1 kHz or more, so that most of the sensitive bars today wouldbe suit<strong>ed</strong> to observe such a signal. Binary coalescence has a spectrum that peaksat low frequencies, so bars are not partiularly well suit<strong>ed</strong> for such signals. Onthe other hand, neutron-star and stellar-mass black-hole normal modes range in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!