12.07.2015 Views

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

400 Numerical relativityof Einstein’s equations, including the ADM formalism and the Bona–Massóhyperbolic formulation, can be chosen as input parameters, as can differentgauge conditions, horizon finders, hydrodynamics evolvers, etc. Cactus was alsodesign<strong>ed</strong> as a community code. After first developing and testing it within ourrather large community of collaborators, it is available with full documentation.By having an entire research community using and contributing to such a code,we hope to accelerate the maturation of numerical relativity. Information aboutthe code is available online, and can be access<strong>ed</strong> at http://www.cactuscode.orgAcknowl<strong>ed</strong>gmentsIt is a pleasure to acknowl<strong>ed</strong>ge many friends and colleagues who have contribut<strong>ed</strong>to the work describ<strong>ed</strong> in this article, some of which was deriv<strong>ed</strong> from papers wehave written together. I especially thank Wai-Mo Suen, who help<strong>ed</strong> write previousreviews on which this article is partly bas<strong>ed</strong>. The Cactus code was originallystart<strong>ed</strong> by Joan Massó and Paul Walker at AEI. Without the contributions frompeople at many institutions, the work describ<strong>ed</strong> here would not have beenpossible. This work has been support<strong>ed</strong> by AEI, NCSA, NSF Grant No PHY-96-00507, NASA HPCC/ESS Grand Challenge Applications Grant No NCCS5-153and NSF MRAC Allocation Grant No MCA93S025.18.9 Further readingHere are some references that we think will help fill in the details of many issueswe can only gloss over. These references are clearly not complete; it was justeasier for us to heavily bias this list towards work coming out of our own group,or closely associat<strong>ed</strong> groups! Our apologies to many others who have written finepapers on these subjects, but we have tri<strong>ed</strong> to give references that are current andrelevant to the most important topics in numerical relativity, if incomplete andbias<strong>ed</strong>.18.9.1 Overviews/formalisms of numerical relativityFor basic 3 + 1 formalism, see [10] and the PhD thesis of Cook [88]. Thisprovides the basics in a very clear, readable way. A somewhat more recent Yorkarticle describes many ‘miscellaneous’ topics, such as more modern initial dataand apparent horizon conditions, etc [20]. However, there are no details on morerecent reformulations of Einstein’s equations for numerical relativity, which arebecoming very important. This is a breaking research area, with new papers everymonth, but some that stand out for hyperbolicity are [32–34, 46, 52, 63, 70, 149,150, and references therein]. Even these are being overtaken by some recentdevelopments! Every month there is new excitement in some variations on all

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!