12.07.2015 Views

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

376 Numerical relativityare the ability to prevent large shearing or drifting of coordinates during anevolution, and the ability to control the coordinate location of a physical object,for example, the horizon of a black hole. These considerations are discuss<strong>ed</strong>below. The development of appropriate shift conditions for full 3D evolution,for systems without symmetries, is an important research area that ne<strong>ed</strong>s muchattention. Geometrical shift conditions that can be formulat<strong>ed</strong> without referenceto specific coordinate systems or symmetries seem to be desirable. The basic ideais to develop a condition that minimizes the stretching, shearing, and driftingof coordinates in a general way. A few examples have been devis<strong>ed</strong> whichpartially meet these goals, such as ‘minimal distortion’, ‘minimal strain’ andvariations [10], but much more investigations are ne<strong>ed</strong><strong>ed</strong>. New gauge conditions,bas<strong>ed</strong> on these earlier proposals, have recently been propos<strong>ed</strong> but not yet test<strong>ed</strong>in numerical simulations [28].It is important to emphasize that the lapse and shift only change the wayin which the slices are chosen through a spacetime and where coordinates arelaid down on every slice, and do not, in principle, affect any physical resultswhatsoever. They will affect the value of the metric quantities, but not the physicsderiv<strong>ed</strong> from them. In this respect the fre<strong>ed</strong>om of choice in the lapse and shift isanalogous to the fre<strong>ed</strong>om of gauge in electromagnetic systems.On the other hand, it is also important to emphasize that proper choices oflapse and shift are crucial for the numerical construction of a spacetime in theEinstein theory of general relativity, in particular in a general 3D setting. In ageneral 3D simulation without symmetry assumption, there is no preferr<strong>ed</strong> choiceof the form of the metric (e.g., a diagonal 3-metric, or g θθ = r 2 as in sphericalsymmetry), hence forcing us to deal with the gauge degree of fre<strong>ed</strong>om in relativityin full. This, when coupl<strong>ed</strong> with the inevitable lower resolution in 3D simulations,often leads to development of coordinate singularities, when evolv<strong>ed</strong> without asophisticat<strong>ed</strong> choice of lapse and shift. Inde<strong>ed</strong> the success of the ‘driver’ ideasuggest<strong>ed</strong> [87] that in order to obtain a stable evolution over a long timescale, itis important to ensure that the coordinate conditions us<strong>ed</strong> are not only suitablefor the geometry of the spacetime being evolv<strong>ed</strong>, but also that the conditionsthemselves are stable. That is, when the condition is perturb<strong>ed</strong>, for example,by numerical inaccuracy, there is no long-term secular drifting. We regard theconstruction of an algorithm for choosing a suitable lapse and shift for a general3D numerical simulation to be one of the most important issues facing numericalrelativity at present.18.3.1 General relativistic hydrodynamicsIn order to make numerical relativity a tool for computational general relativisticastrophysics, it is important to combine numerical relativity with traditional toolsof computational astrophysics, and, in particular, relativistic hydrodynamics.While a large amount of 3D studies in numerical relativity have been devot<strong>ed</strong>to the vacuum Einstein equations, the spacetime dynamics with a non-vanishing

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!