12.07.2015 Views

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

352 Post-Newtonian computation of binary inspiral waveforms∫ ∫ 1{I L (u) = finite part d 3 4(2l + 1)x dz δ l ˆx L −−1c 2 (l + 1)(2l + 3) δ l+1 ˆx iL ∂ t i}2(2l + 1)+c 4 (l + 1)(l + 2)(2l + 5) δ l+2 ˆx ijL ∂t 2 ij , (17.67)∫ ∫ 1J L (u) = finite part d 3 x dz ε aba b−1}2l + 1−c 2 (l + 2)(2l + 3) δ l+1 ˆx L−1>ac ∂ t bc . (17.68)Here the integrand is evaluat<strong>ed</strong> at the instant u + z| x|/c, ε abc is the Levi-Civitasymbol, 〈L〉 is the STF projection, and we employ the notation = τ 00 + τ iic 2 ; i = τ 0ic ; ij = τ ij (17.69)(with τ ii = δ ij τ ij ). The multipole moments I L , J L are valid formally up to anypost-Newtonian order, and constitute a generalization in the nonlinear theory ofthe usual mass and current Newtonian moments (see, [14] for details). It can becheck<strong>ed</strong> that, when consider<strong>ed</strong> at the 1PN order, these moments agree with th<strong>ed</strong>ifferent expressions obtain<strong>ed</strong> in [9] (case of mass moments) and in [10] (currentmoments).17.5.3 Radiative momentsIn lineariz<strong>ed</strong> theory, where we can neglect the gravitational source term µν in(17.57), as well as the first term in (17.63), the source multipole moments coincidewith the so-call<strong>ed</strong> radiative multipole moments, defin<strong>ed</strong> as the coefficients of themultipole expansion of the 1/r term in the distance to the source at retard<strong>ed</strong> timest − r/c = constant. However, in full nonlinear theory, the first term in (17.63)will bring another contribution to the 1/r term at future null infinity. Therefore,the source multipole moments are not the ‘measur<strong>ed</strong>’ ones at infinity, and sothey must be relat<strong>ed</strong> to the real observables of the field at infinity which areconstitut<strong>ed</strong> by the radiative moments. It has been known for a long time thatthe harmonic coordinates do not belong to the class of Bondi coordinate systemsat infinity, because the expansion of the harmonic metric when r → ∞ witht − r/c = constant involves, in addition to the normal powers of 1/r, somepowers of the logarithm of r. Let us change the coordinates from harmonic tosome Bondi-type or ‘radiative’ coordinates ( X, T ) such that the metric admits apower-like expansion without logarithms when R →∞with T − R/c = constantand R =|X| (it can be shown that the condition to be satisfi<strong>ed</strong> by the radiativecoordinate system is that the retard<strong>ed</strong> time T − R/c becomes asymptotically nullat infinity). For the purpose of deriving the formula (17.73) below it is sufficient

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!