12.07.2015 Views

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Analysis of beam detectors 21This depends only on the wave amplitude when the beam leaves and when itreturns.Let us consider now a more realistic geometry than the previous one, andin particular suppose that the wave travels at an angle θ to the z-axis in the x–zplane. If we r<strong>ed</strong>o this calculation, allowing the phase of the wave to depend onx in an appropriate way, and taking into account the fact that h TT+ xx is r<strong>ed</strong>uc<strong>ed</strong> ifthe wave is not moving in a direction perpendicular to x, we find (see exercise (a)at the end of this chapter for the details of the calculation)dt returndt= 1 {(1 − sin θ)hxx + (t + 2L) − (1 + sin θ)hxx +2 (t)+ 2 sin θh+ xx [t + L(1 − sin θ)]}. (2.20)This three-term relation is the starting point for analysing the response of all beamdetectors. This is directly what happens in radar ranging or in transpondingto spacecraft, where a beam in only one direction is us<strong>ed</strong>. In long-baselineinterferometry, one must analyse the second beam as well. We shall discuss thesecases in turn.2.4 Analysis of beam detectors2.4.1 Ranging to spacecraftBoth NASA and ESA perform experiments in which they monitor the return timeof communication signals with interplanetary spacecraft for the characteristiceffect of gravitational <strong>waves</strong>. For missions to Jupiter and Saturn, the return timesare of the order 2–4 × 10 3 s. Any gravitational wave event shorter than thiswill leave an imprint on the delay time three times: once when the wave passesthe Earth-bas<strong>ed</strong> transmitter, once when it passes the spacecraft, and once whenit passes the Earth-bas<strong>ed</strong> receiver. Searches use a form of pattern matching tolook for this characteristic imprint. There are two dominant sources of noise:propagation-time irregularities caus<strong>ed</strong> by fluctuations in the solar wind plasma,and timing noise in the clocks us<strong>ed</strong> to measure the signals. The plasma delaysdepend on the radio-wave frequency, so by using two transmission frequenciesone can model and subtract the plasma noise. Then if one uses the most stableatomic clocks, it is possible to achieve sensitivities for h of the order 10 −13 .Inthe future, using higher radio frequencies, such experiments may reach 10 −15 .No positive detections have yet been made, but the chances are not zero. Forexample, if a small black hole fell into a massive black hole in the centre ofthe Galaxy, it would produce a signal with a frequency of about 10 mHz and anamplitude significantly bigger than 10 −15 . Rare as this might be, it would be adramatic event to observe.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!