12.07.2015 Views

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

304 Elementary introduction to pre-big bang cosmologyIt is important to stress that there is no ne<strong>ed</strong> to introduce the canonicalvariable to study the classical evolution of perturbations, but that such variableis ne<strong>ed</strong><strong>ed</strong> for the initial normalization to a vacuum fluctuation spectrum. Wecan also normalize perturbation in a different way, of course but in that case weare studying the amplification not of the vacuum fluctuations, but of a differentspectrum [55].At this point, two remarks are in order. The first concerns the frameindependenceof the spectrum. The above proc<strong>ed</strong>ure can also be appli<strong>ed</strong> in theE-frame, to define a canonical variable ˜ψ: one then obatins for ˜ψ k the canonicalequation (16.75), with a pump field that depends only on the metric, ˜z = ã.However, by using the conformal transformation connecting the two frames, itturns out that the two pump fields are the same, ˜z = ã = ae −φ/2 = z, so thatfor ψ and ˜ψ we have the same potential, the same evolution equation, the samesolution, and thus the same spectrum.The second remark is that the canonical proc<strong>ed</strong>ure can be appli<strong>ed</strong> to anyaction, and in particular to the string effective action including higher curvaturecorrections of order α ′ , which can be written as [21]:∫S = d 4 x √ {}−ge −φ −R − ∂ µ φ∂ µ φ + α′4 [R2 GB − (∂ µφ∂ µ φ) 2 ] (16.78)where RGB2 ≡ R2 µναβ − 4R2 µν + R2 is the Gauss–Bonnet invariant (we havechosen a convenient field r<strong>ed</strong>efinition that removes terms with higher-than-secondderivatives from the equations of motion, see appendix A). From the quadraticperturb<strong>ed</strong> action we obtain α ′ corrections to the pump fields. The canonicalequation turns out to be the same as before, but with a k-dependent effectivepotential [54], and such an equation can be us<strong>ed</strong> to estimate the effects of thehigher curvature corrections on the amplification of tensor perturbations. Anumerical integration [54], in which the metric fluctuations are expand<strong>ed</strong> aroundthe high-curvature background solution of [21], leads in particular to the resultsillustrat<strong>ed</strong> in figure 16.6.The qualitative behaviour is similar, both with and without α ′ correctionsin the perturb<strong>ed</strong> equations: the fluctuations are oscillating inside the horizon andfrozen outside the horizon, as usual. However, the final amplitude is enhanc<strong>ed</strong>when α ′ corrections are includ<strong>ed</strong>, and this suggests that the energy spectrum ofthe gravitational radiation, comput<strong>ed</strong> with the low-energy perturbation equation,may represent a sort of lower bound on the total amount of produc<strong>ed</strong> gravitons.16.5.4 Computation of the spectrumThe final, amplifi<strong>ed</strong> perturbation spectrum is to be obtain<strong>ed</strong> from the solutionsof the canonical equation (16.75). In order to solve such an equation wene<strong>ed</strong> explicitly the effective potential V [z(η)] which, in general, vanishesasymptotically at large positive and negative values of the conformal time.Consider, for instance, the tensor perturbation equation in the E-frame, so that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!