12.07.2015 Views

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Precession of a gyroscope in geodesic motion 277from (15.11), will be seen by U as the corresponding axes with the sameorientation which are ‘momentarily at rest’. The orientation of the spin vectorS with respect to the axes ¯λ(U)â is also the orientation of S with respect to themoving axes λ(u)â.The velocity of spin precession then corresponds to the spatial dual ofthe Fermi–Walker structure functions of ¯λ(U)â, namely C (fw) (U, ¯λ(U)â) ˆbâ ,according to relation (15.23).Confining our attention to the weak-field approximation, the components ofthe precession velocity with respect to the triad ¯λ(U)â areζ (fw,U,¯λ(U)â) ˆ1 ≃ − 1 2 h 23,tζ (fw,U,¯λ(U)â) ˆ2 ≃ α/2h 22,tζ (fw,U,¯λ(U)â) ˆ3 ≃ α/2h 23,t . (15.34)We observe that in the limit of small linear momentum, α ≪ 1, th<strong>ed</strong>ominant precession is in the direction of wave propagation e(u) ˆ1(to zerothorder, ¯λ(U)ˆ1 ≃ e(u)ˆ1 ) and is induc<strong>ed</strong> by the cross-polarization only. (Note thatthe precession in the direction of propagation of the wave does not depend onα.) In this case we can conclude that the gyro can act as a polarization filter forgravitational <strong>waves</strong>.In the opposite limit of large linear momentum, α ≫ 1, the precession vectorlies mainly in the plane orthogonal to the propagation direction and is contribut<strong>ed</strong>likewise by both polarizations. Inde<strong>ed</strong> the measurement of the precession induc<strong>ed</strong>by a plane gravitational wave, of a gyroscope set in relativistic motion, wouldenable one to identify the local direction of propagation of the wave. A similarsituation will be encounter<strong>ed</strong> in the rest frame of u, where from (15.17), (15.28)and (15.29) we have:˜ζ ˆ1 = γ −1(fw,u,λ(u)â) (U,u) B (lrs,U,u)ζ ˆ1 (fw,U,¯λ(U)â) ≃− 1 2˜ζ ˆ2 = γ −1(fw,u,λ(u)â) (U,u) B (lrs,U,u)ζ ˆ2 (fw,U,¯λ(U)â) ≃ 1 2˜ζ ˆ3 = γ −1(fw,u,λ(u)â) (U,u) B (lrs,U,u)ζ ˆ3 (fw,U,¯λ(U)â) ≃ 1 21√ h 23,t1 + α 2α√ h 22,t1 + α 2α√ h 23,t. (15.35)1 + α 2Finally, let us note that results (15.35) are only slightly modifi<strong>ed</strong> afterrotating the frame (15.31) by a constant angle φ around the propagation directionof the wave. In fact, in this case, the new spatial u-frame becomesf (u)ˆ1 = λ(u)ˆ1f (u)ˆ2 = cos φλ(u)ˆ2 + sin φλ(u)ˆ3f (u)ˆ3 =−sin φλ(u)ˆ2 + cos φλ(u)ˆ3 ; (15.36)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!