12.07.2015 Views

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

262 Infinite-dimensional symmetries in gravityThe dependence of this equation on ρ is all that remains of three-dimensionalgravity. Equation (14.126) r<strong>ed</strong>uces to the Ernst equation for G = SL(2, R), butwe will return to this later. For the moment, note only that this equation works forthe σ -model degrees of fre<strong>ed</strong>om, namely on .The remaining equations, which follow from higher dimensions, are theequations for the dilaton ρ and for the conformal factor λ. ρ is a free field intwo dimensions which can be solv<strong>ed</strong> for in terms of two arbitrary functions (leftmoversand right-movers)£ρ = 0 ⇒ ρ(x) = ρ + (x + ) + ρ − (x − ). (14.127)The equations of motion for the conformal factor in light-cone coordinatesρ −1 ∂ ± ρλ −1 ∂ ± λ = 1 2 Tr(P ± P ± ) + 1 2 ρ−1 ∂ 2 ± ρ (14.128)can be written as∂ ± ρ∂ ± ˆσ = 1 2 ρ Tr P ± P ± (14.129)where the second term on the right-hand side of (14.128) has been reabsorb<strong>ed</strong> intothe Liouville scalar ˆσ = λ(∂ + ρ) − 1 2 (∂ − ρ) − 1 2 . Note that this equation determinesλ only up to a constant factor. Observe also that this equation has no analoguein flat space theories, and this, together with the presence of ρ, makes a greatdifference. For instance, we cannot simply put ρ = constant, for this wouldimply the vanishing of the right-hand side of (14.129), which by the positivity ofthe Killing metric on the subalgebra K would imply P ± = 0 and leave us onlywith the trivial solution v = constant (modulo H gauge transformations).Now specializing to general relativity, i.e. G/H = SL(2, R)/SO(2) cosetspace. As anticipat<strong>ed</strong> before, we start from the equation of motion (14.126),employ the triangular gauge in the Ehlers form, so to have explicit expressionsfor P µ and Q ν . After a little algebra we have again the Ernst equation∂ µ (ρ∂ µ ) = ρ∂ µ ∂ µ (14.130)in terms of the complex potential = + iB. Solving Einstein’s equationsis now simply a matter of choosing the appropriate ρ(x), finding a solution ofthe nonlinear partial differential equation (14.130) and finally determining theconformal factor λ by integration of (14.129). For the colliding plane <strong>waves</strong>olutions, that will be recover<strong>ed</strong> in the next sections, one distinguishes <strong>waves</strong> withcollinear polarization, where B = 0 and <strong>waves</strong> with non-collinear polarization.For collinearly polariz<strong>ed</strong> <strong>waves</strong>, the nonlinear Ernst equation can be r<strong>ed</strong>uc<strong>ed</strong> to alinear partial differential equation through the replacement = exp ψ.So, for collinearly polariz<strong>ed</strong> <strong>waves</strong>, with B = 0, the four-bein is⎛λ −1/2 ⎞0 0 0E A ⎜ 0 λM =−1/2 0 0 ⎟⎝0 0 ρ −1/2 ⎠ (14.131)00 0 0 1/2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!