12.07.2015 Views

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

238 Sources of SGWBof interferometers). The radiation from a single source is not a problem, sinceit is easily distinguish<strong>ed</strong> from a stochastic background. The problem arises ifthere are many unresolv<strong>ed</strong> sources. (Of course this is a problem from the pointof view of the cosmological background, but the observation of the astrophysicalbackground would be very interesting in itself; techniques for the detection of thisbackground with a single interferometer using the fact that it is not isotropic andexploiting the sideral modulation of the signal have been discuss<strong>ed</strong> in [66].)The stochastic background from rotating neutron stars has been discuss<strong>ed</strong>in [67] and references therein. The main uncertainty comes from the estimateof the typical ellipticity ɛ of the neutron star, which measures its deviation fromsphericity. An upper bound on ɛ can be obtain<strong>ed</strong> assuming that the observ<strong>ed</strong>slowing down of the period of known pulsars is entirely due to the emission ofgravitational radiation. This is almost certainly a gross overestimate, since mostof the spin down is probably due to electromagnetic losses, at least for Crab-likepulsars. With realistic estimates for ɛ, [67] gives a value of h 2 0 gw(100 Hz) ∼10 −15 . This is very far from the sensitivity of even the advanc<strong>ed</strong> experiments. Anabsolute upper bound can be obtain<strong>ed</strong> assuming that the spin down is due only togravitational losses, and this gives h 2 0 gw(100 Hz) ∼ 10 −7 , but again this valueis probably a gross overestimate. Very recently the gravitational background hasalso been estimat<strong>ed</strong> [68] produc<strong>ed</strong> by a cosmological population of hot, youngand rapidly rotating neutron stars. Within a reasonable range of values of themain parameters which characterize the energy spectrum of a single source, theauthors of [68] find that h 2 0 gw( f ) show a long plateau extending from ≈300 Hzup to ≈1.7 kHz, with an amplitude of ≈(2.2–3.3) × 10 −8 .In [69] the stochastic background has been consider<strong>ed</strong> emitt<strong>ed</strong> by acosmological population of core-collapse supernovae for a range of progenitormasses leading to a black hole. The expect<strong>ed</strong> frequencies in this case are ofthe order of kHz or lower, depending on the r<strong>ed</strong>shift when these objects areproduc<strong>ed</strong>. Using the observational data on the star formation rate, it turnsout that the duty cycle, i.e. the ratio between the duration of a typical burstand the typical time interval between successive bursts is low, of order 0.01.Therefore, this background is not stochastic, but rather like a ‘pop noise’, andcan be distinguish<strong>ed</strong> from a really stochastic background. The value of h 2 0 gwfor the background from supernovae have been comput<strong>ed</strong> in [69] assumingaxially symmetric collapse, and assuming that all sources have the same valueof a = J/(GM 2 ), where J is the angular momentum. The results depend onthe value of a, and on h 0 . Assuming h 0 = 0.5 and typical values of a, onefinds that gw ( f ) has a maximum amplitude ranging between 10 −11 –10 −10 inthe frequency interval (1.5–2.5) kHz.These results suggest that astrophysical backgrounds might not be a problemfor the detection of a relic background at VIRGO/LIGO frequencies. Thesituation is different in the LISA frequency band [63, 65, 67, 70, 71]. LISA canreach a sensitivity of order h 2 0 gw ∼ afew×10 −13 at f ∼ 10 −3 Hz (see figure 1.3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!