12.07.2015 Views

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

228 Sources of SGWB−6−9−12−15−18−20 −15 −10 −5 0 5log (f / Hz)Figure 13.4. h 2 0 gw against the physical frequency f (logarithmic scales). Heref 1 = 100 kHz.Given the shape of the spectrum (see figure 13.4) one obtains in thefrequency region of interest for VIRGO the following bound:h 2 0 gw < 8 × 10 −14 , (13.29)many orders of magnitude below the sensitivity limit of the plann<strong>ed</strong> detectors.Finally we remark that the result report<strong>ed</strong> in equation (13.27) is valid ifthe Hubble parameter during inflation is strictly constant; the calculation can b<strong>ed</strong>one also for other, more realistic models, but the final result is not significantlydifferent from the one report<strong>ed</strong> above. For instance, in the so-call<strong>ed</strong> ‘slowroll’inflation the Hubble parameter is slightly decreasing during the inflationarystage and makes the spectrum slightly tilt<strong>ed</strong>, instead of constant, in the radiationdominat<strong>ed</strong>region. Anyway the tilt is so small that the value of gw at interestingfrequencies is different from the one of equation (13.29) only for an order ofmagnitude (in addition this correction has the ‘wrong’ sign, i.e. it lowers thebound!).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!