12.07.2015 Views

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Inflation 225as a first approximation we can assume that this amplification takes place as longas k < V (η). The last inequality, apart from irrelevant numerical factors due toour approximation, turns out to have the same analytical form of the condition:kR < R′R 2 ≡ H (η),that relates the physical momentum of the perturbation to the Hubble parameterH , whose inverse corresponds to the horizon size: this is just the conditionanticipat<strong>ed</strong> above, i.e. that a perturbation is amplifi<strong>ed</strong> when its wavelengthbecomes larger than the event horizon.13.2.2 Calculation of the spectrumTo calculate the spectrum of perturbations we ne<strong>ed</strong> to find particular solutionsof the Schrödinger-like equation previously introduc<strong>ed</strong>. Let us, then, specify ourmodel: the form of the potential V is determin<strong>ed</strong> by the evolution of R(η); forour purposes it is sufficient to consider a three-stage model in which, as shownin figure 13.3, a de Sitter phase (characteriz<strong>ed</strong> by a constant Hubble parameterH ds ) is follow<strong>ed</strong> by a radiation-dominat<strong>ed</strong> (RD) and, then, by a matter-dominat<strong>ed</strong>(MD) era:⎧− 1H ds η , η < η 1 < 0 de Sitter⎪⎨ η − 2η 1R(η) ∼H ds η 2 , η 1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!