12.07.2015 Views

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Achievable sensitivities to the SGWB 197Figure 12.3. The overlap r<strong>ed</strong>uction function for the correlation of VIRGO withNAUTILUS (full curve), AURIGA (broken curve), and EXPLORER (dott<strong>ed</strong> curve) in thecase in which the angles λ, having the values report<strong>ed</strong> in table 12.3, coincide with the angleξ of VIRGO.12.4 Achievable sensitivities to the SGWBIn the following we apply the results of the prec<strong>ed</strong>ing sections to estimatethe expect<strong>ed</strong> sensitivities of the correlation among the various detectors to thestochastic background.12.4.1 Single detectorsTo better appreciate the importance of correlating two detectors, it is instructive toconsider first the sensitivity that can be obtain<strong>ed</strong> using only one detector. In thiscase a hypothetical signal would manifest itself as an excess noise, and shouldtherefore satisfy S h ( f ) ² S n ( f ). By imposing this condition to equation (12.28)and introducing the notation ˜h 2 f= S n ( f ), for the minimum detectable value ofh 2 0 gw one hash 2 0 min( ) ()gw ( f ) ≃ 1.3 × f 3 2˜h f10−2100 Hz 10 −22 Hz −1/2 . (12.48)This function in the case of VIRGO is plott<strong>ed</strong> in figure 12.5, where thefollowing analytical approximation for the noise power spectrum has been us<strong>ed</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!