12.07.2015 Views

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

(ed.). Gravitational waves (IOP, 2001)(422s).

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

146 LISA: A propos<strong>ed</strong> joint ESA–NASA gravitational-wave missionLISA frequency band. In any case, LISA will improve the limits on a possiblecosmic background in its frequency band, but the chances of seeing anythingappear to be very uncertain.10.2.6 Future prospectsProvid<strong>ed</strong> that signals involving massive black holes are inde<strong>ed</strong> seen by LISA,it is likely that there will be an opportunity for a later advanc<strong>ed</strong> gravitationalwavemission. Depending on what is seen, there are several directions in whichmajor instrumental improvements could be made. If improvements in sensitivityat frequencies above 3 mHz are of most interest, this can be achiev<strong>ed</strong> by increasingthe telescope size and the laser power, provid<strong>ed</strong> that comparable r<strong>ed</strong>uctions inother noise sources such as beam pointing jitter and phase measurement errorsalso can be made. Shortening the antenna arm length also would be desirable. Ifimprovements below about 0.1 mHz are the main objective, then improv<strong>ed</strong> freemass sensors and longer arm lengths would be ne<strong>ed</strong><strong>ed</strong>.As an example of a mission to achieve strongly increas<strong>ed</strong> high-frequencysensitivity, a goal of using 10 W lasers and 1 m diameter telescopes might bechosen, along with a r<strong>ed</strong>uction in the antenna arm length to 50 000 km. Theresulting factor of about 10 7 increase in the receiv<strong>ed</strong> power would r<strong>ed</strong>uce the shotnoise contribution to measuring changes in the arm length difference from about1 × 10 −11 m/rtHz to 3 × 10 −15 m/rtHz, but the signal strength for frequenciesbelow about 1 Hz would be r<strong>ed</strong>uc<strong>ed</strong> also because of the r<strong>ed</strong>uc<strong>ed</strong> arm lengths. Ifother errors such as from beam pointing jitter and from the phase measurementsonly double the distance measurement error, the level of the LISA thresholdsensitivity curve can be r<strong>ed</strong>uc<strong>ed</strong> by a factor ranging from about 20 at 10 mHzto 3000 at 1 Hz, and then retaining that value at higher frequencies. However,with the same assumptions about the confusion noise level due to extragalacticCWDBs as us<strong>ed</strong> for figures 10.8–10.11, and plausible estimates for extragalacticneutron star and black hole binaries, the overall sensitivity will be limit<strong>ed</strong> moreby the confusion noise than the instrumental noise up to at least 100 mHz.One strategy that is not plann<strong>ed</strong> for LISA but probably would be us<strong>ed</strong> in alater high-frequency mission with shorter arm lengths is to apply enough forceto each test mass to keep the rates of change of the arm lengths constant. Thisis because the force requir<strong>ed</strong> is about a factor 6000 less for 50 000 km arms, orroughly 4 × 10 −10 ms −2 . Also, the main emphasis is on the noise level above3 mHz, where keeping fluctuations in the appli<strong>ed</strong> voltages low is easier than atlower frequencies. This would make the phase measurements very much simplerthan they would be with substantial Doppler shifts.Quite a few types of measurements could be improv<strong>ed</strong> considerably withthe above sensitivity. For example, gradual coalescences of 10M ⊙ black holeswith MBHs with masses down to 10 3 M ⊙ could be observ<strong>ed</strong> virtually anywherein the universe, if they occur. And tests of general relativity for coalescenceswith highly unequal masses would have considerably higher S/N ratios, as well

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!