02.12.2012 Views

news release - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk

news release - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk

news release - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Core Strategy<br />

document<br />

section<br />

Vision<br />

(Statement 1)<br />

Spatial Strategy<br />

(Policy 1)<br />

Policies for<br />

Places<br />

Settlement<br />

Hierarchy (Policy<br />

2)<br />

full on our website. Below is a summary <strong>of</strong> the major issues raised by<br />

respondents and <strong>of</strong>ficer responses to these.<br />

Issue raised Suggested action<br />

1. Vision and Objectives ought to be<br />

separated for clarity<br />

2. Vision ought to specify targets e.g.<br />

housing provision<br />

1. The debate upon the suitability <strong>of</strong> the<br />

strategic approaches overall is <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

influenced by desires to promote<br />

specific sites and challenge<br />

competing aspirations.<br />

2. Some challenge concerns <strong>of</strong><br />

inadequacies in infrastructure by<br />

either ignoring published studies or<br />

dismissing anecdotal evidence e.g.<br />

parish opinions, as irrelevant.<br />

3. Strategic housing provision – need to<br />

clarify timeline and differing targets:<br />

� 5 year supply<br />

� RSS - 2021<br />

� PPS 3 – 2025<br />

� Contingencies for non-delivery<br />

� RSS Review<br />

1. Need to clarify/justify suggested<br />

dispersal figures notably:<br />

� King’s <strong>Lynn</strong> (why 7,100<br />

d/50,000 pop?)<br />

� Downham to receive greater<br />

role and allocation / too great a<br />

provision in rural areas<br />

� Review criteria and role <strong>of</strong><br />

Settlement Hierarchy<br />

� Possible role <strong>of</strong> KSC –<br />

significant/positive growth<br />

versus local need<br />

� Confusion between overall<br />

provision and new allocations<br />

1. Agree. Vision and objectives to<br />

be included under separate<br />

headings<br />

2. Disagree, targets are objectives<br />

and should be kept separate<br />

from the aspirations.<br />

1. Noted but the Core Strategy<br />

needs to have its foundation in<br />

spatial thinking to help achieve<br />

the vision.<br />

2. Review evidence in light <strong>of</strong><br />

current infrastructure study and<br />

consider stronger means to<br />

present non-technical views.<br />

3. Need to resolve confusion in<br />

policy, will be revised.<br />

Explain the changing relationship<br />

with RSS and other assumptions.<br />

Consider greater provision in towns.<br />

Assess values and possible need<br />

for additional layer(s).<br />

Review/reassess rural sustainability<br />

objectives and clarify.<br />

Clarify relationships and<br />

Overall/built/committed/required.<br />

Kings <strong>Lynn</strong> 1. Option 1 challenged on flood-risk 1. Note national policy on<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!