12.07.2015 Views

MRes Translational Medicine Academic year 2012/2013 Division of ...

MRes Translational Medicine Academic year 2012/2013 Division of ...

MRes Translational Medicine Academic year 2012/2013 Division of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>MRes</strong> in Clinical Research (Pathway in <strong>Translational</strong> <strong>Medicine</strong>) - <strong>Academic</strong> Year <strong>2012</strong>-<strong>2013</strong>Percentage markGrade given to student80% A*DistinctionResearch question & use <strong>of</strong>literature searchFailure to identify research question ordemonstrate any strategy forliterature search.Clear research question identifiedand articulated. Evidence that a wellformedsearch strategy was applied.Clear research question identifiedand well articulated. Evidence thata well formed search strategy wasapplied extending beyondelectronic databaseClear research question identified,justified and well articulated. Evidencethat a comprehensive search strategywas undertaken with appropriatefiltering.PresentationWork is illegible, poor use <strong>of</strong> English.Presentation does not meet criteriastatedWork is clearly presented with gooduse <strong>of</strong> English. Presentation meetsthe stated criteria well.Work is clearly presented withgood use <strong>of</strong> English. Presentationmeets or exceeds the criteriarequired.Appropriatepresentation <strong>of</strong> illustratedmaterial.Work is clearly presented with gooduse <strong>of</strong> English. Presentation exceedsthe criteria required. Sophisticatedpresentation <strong>of</strong> illustrated material.Demonstration <strong>of</strong>understanding & knowledgeContent shows inadequate knowledge<strong>of</strong> the contextual subject and littleunderstanding <strong>of</strong> the relationship <strong>of</strong>the material presented to the subjectarea.Content shows good knowledge <strong>of</strong>the contextual subject and a goodunderstanding <strong>of</strong> the relationship <strong>of</strong>the material presented to the subjectareaContent shows advancedknowledge <strong>of</strong> the contextualsubject and a thoroughunderstanding <strong>of</strong> the relationship<strong>of</strong> the material presented to thesubject area.Content shows extensive knowledge <strong>of</strong>the contextual subject and a thoroughand original understanding <strong>of</strong> therelationship <strong>of</strong> the material presentedto the subject area.AnalysisWork is descriptive in nature with noor limited evidence <strong>of</strong> analysis.Good evidence <strong>of</strong> analysis.Shows ability to analyse materialwell in a clearly realistic and logicalwayDemonstrates keen analytical skills.Interpretation & applicationWrong or no interpretation <strong>of</strong> data.No application to practice.Clear interpretation <strong>of</strong> data.Evidence <strong>of</strong> well-formed, logicalapplication to problem-solvingrelevant to chosen context.Good interpretation <strong>of</strong> data.Evidence <strong>of</strong> incisive and logicalapplication to problem-solvingrelevant to chosen context.Excellent interpretation <strong>of</strong> data.Evidence <strong>of</strong> clear, innovative andlogical application to problem-solvingrelevant to chosen context.24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!