12.07.2015 Views

Report and Recommendations - Scottish Government

Report and Recommendations - Scottish Government

Report and Recommendations - Scottish Government

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

appropriate ground for both arrest <strong>and</strong> detention. “Reasonable suspicion” isthe st<strong>and</strong>ard currently required to detain a suspect in Scotl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> it is,therefore, a threshold with which the police <strong>and</strong> other law enforcementagencies are familiar, even if it is not sufficient, without more, to justify arrestat common law. It is therefore proposed that this st<strong>and</strong>ard is adopted as theuniform ground for arrest.5.1.32 It is not sufficient justification for the continued detention of a suspect thatthere is a reasonable suspicion that he/she has committed a crime. When thesuspect is brought to the police station, a decision ought to be taken onwhether he/she should be detained in custody. That decision should be basedon whether, notwithst<strong>and</strong>ing that there is reasonable suspicion, it is necessary<strong>and</strong> proportionate for that detention to be authorised. If the suspect canreasonably be brought before the court without resort to the continueddeprivation of the suspect’s liberty, then detention ought not to be authorised.There are two broad grounds where it would be reasonable not to release asuspect prior to his/her court appearance. These are: (i) where the suspect is,if released, likely to behave incompatibly with the due administration ofjustice; <strong>and</strong> (ii) where his/her presence is reasonably required to enable thecrime to be properly investigated, for example by means of questioning or bythe taking of samples in line with the decisions in Brogan <strong>and</strong> Murray.Examples of the former category include the risk of escape, prospective failureto appear at an appointed court diet, the likelihood of committing furthercrimes <strong>and</strong> the possibility that the suspect may destroy evidence, interfere withwitnesses or otherwise obstruct the course of justice.91

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!