Report and Recommendations - Scottish Government
Report and Recommendations - Scottish Government Report and Recommendations - Scottish Government
operates in a context where the human rights of all, including those of bothsuspect and victim, are adequately and effectively protected.4.0.14 In considering the road down which Scotland should travel in relation tosecuring justice in its adversarial trial system, the Review has concluded, aftermuch reflection, that the requirement for corroboration, which has existedsince time immemorial, should be abolished in favour of a qualitativeassessment of evidence. This will, if accepted, prompt widespread change inpolice and prosecution practice. It will terminate the situation, whichcurrently exists, whereby the alleged perpetrator of a crime cannot beprosecuted because corroboration chances not to have been found. It is theReview’s conclusion that the abolition of the requirement will not, to anymaterial degree, increase the likelihood of miscarriages of justice occurringwithin the system. It will promote the idea of justice for all and introduce intothe courts a more liberal approach to the assessment of evidence, of a naturewhich exists throughout continental Europe and is prevalent too in the otherparts of the United Kingdom, Ireland and countries where common lawadversarial systems predominate. Although not so evident in those systems,the Review also recommends, for similar reasons, the abolition of the complexrules which discriminate between the admissibility of statements by accusedpersons according to whether they are classified as incriminatory, exculpatoryor mixed.4.0.15 The abolition of the requirement for corroboration may change the type ofadvice which is given by solicitors to clients about to be interviewed by the68
police, but the Review has stepped back from the suggestion that an adverseinference should be drawn from a suspect’s decision not to respond to some,or all, questions posed by the police.4.0.16 In relation to appeals, the proposals aim to abolish outmoded methods ofappeal in favour of an integrated system of appeals, with leave of first instancecourts, from all pre trial decisions and, with leave of the High Court, from alldeterminations of a final nature. There are measures designed to achievegreater finality and certainty in the appeal process and to eradicate abuses of,and delays in, that process. Finally, it is recommended that the High Courtshould not have a gate keeping role in references from the SCCRC but that thewider interests of justice should be a consideration for the Court in decidingreference appeals.69
- Page 19 and 20: of the points made at each of these
- Page 21 and 22: Topics outwith the scope of the Rev
- Page 23: Convention, describes the overall v
- Page 26 and 27: Justice-Clerk (Inglis) stated to a
- Page 28 and 29: arrest and liberty. There was nothi
- Page 30 and 31: he/she does not do so, he/she risks
- Page 32 and 33: e a matter of fact to be determined
- Page 34 and 35: question the suspect until he/she b
- Page 36 and 37: Committee’s report when read as a
- Page 38 and 39: ultimate arbiter of constitutionali
- Page 40 and 41: was cautioned, but not told that he
- Page 42 and 43: at the whole circumstances of the c
- Page 44 and 45: Cadder2.0.35 Mr Cadder was aged 16
- Page 46 and 47: 2.0.39 Compelling reasons would hav
- Page 48 and 49: 2.0.44 These guidelines were supers
- Page 50 and 51: first required to have been “subs
- Page 52 and 53: The long term implication of this,
- Page 54 and 55: and of society as a whole. The purp
- Page 56 and 57: giving rise to the reasonable suspi
- Page 58 and 59: 3.0.15 The right of silence and the
- Page 60 and 61: complacency must be avoided and the
- Page 62 and 63: unlawful for a public authority to
- Page 64 and 65: 4.0.3 In short, the Review has gras
- Page 66 and 67: The System4.0.7 The recommendations
- Page 68 and 69: window during which these investiga
- Page 73 and 74: 5.0 CUSTODY CHAPTERS OVERVIEW5.0.1
- Page 75 and 76: next step, as quickly as possible.
- Page 77 and 78: 5.1 ARREST AND DETENTIONIntroductio
- Page 79 and 80: 5.1.6 The Review has considered whe
- Page 81 and 82: Arrest without warrant5.1.9 A polic
- Page 83 and 84: 5.1.12 It was because of this lack
- Page 85 and 86: 5.1.15 Reasonable suspicion permits
- Page 87 and 88: arrest, without warrant, any person
- Page 89 and 90: interview. The Court stated that th
- Page 91 and 92: of the suspect and subsequent crimi
- Page 93 and 94: appropriate ground for both arrest
- Page 95 and 96: justified by the evidence gathered
- Page 97: (d) may destroy evidence, interfere
- Page 100 and 101: Current law5.2.3 In terms of sectio
- Page 102 and 103: 5.2.5 Particularly in view of the t
- Page 104 and 105: individuals were being detained wit
- Page 106 and 107: significant crimes, reflected that
- Page 108 and 109: ConsiderationThe period before char
- Page 110 and 111: the investigation and prosecution o
- Page 112 and 113: ignored. There are about 100 detent
- Page 114 and 115: 5.2.26 Scotland is a small jurisdic
- Page 116 and 117: 5.2.29 Continuing with the custody
- Page 118 and 119: 5.2.32 The sheriffs principal and s
operates in a context where the human rights of all, including those of bothsuspect <strong>and</strong> victim, are adequately <strong>and</strong> effectively protected.4.0.14 In considering the road down which Scotl<strong>and</strong> should travel in relation tosecuring justice in its adversarial trial system, the Review has concluded, aftermuch reflection, that the requirement for corroboration, which has existedsince time immemorial, should be abolished in favour of a qualitativeassessment of evidence. This will, if accepted, prompt widespread change inpolice <strong>and</strong> prosecution practice. It will terminate the situation, whichcurrently exists, whereby the alleged perpetrator of a crime cannot beprosecuted because corroboration chances not to have been found. It is theReview’s conclusion that the abolition of the requirement will not, to anymaterial degree, increase the likelihood of miscarriages of justice occurringwithin the system. It will promote the idea of justice for all <strong>and</strong> introduce intothe courts a more liberal approach to the assessment of evidence, of a naturewhich exists throughout continental Europe <strong>and</strong> is prevalent too in the otherparts of the United Kingdom, Irel<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> countries where common lawadversarial systems predominate. Although not so evident in those systems,the Review also recommends, for similar reasons, the abolition of the complexrules which discriminate between the admissibility of statements by accusedpersons according to whether they are classified as incriminatory, exculpatoryor mixed.4.0.15 The abolition of the requirement for corroboration may change the type ofadvice which is given by solicitors to clients about to be interviewed by the68