Report and Recommendations - Scottish Government

Report and Recommendations - Scottish Government Report and Recommendations - Scottish Government

lx.iriss.org.uk
from lx.iriss.org.uk More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

The long term implication of this, which was highlighted in Cadder, is thatthere is a need to develop a system of criminal justice based on the protectionof human rights; in particular those contained in Articles 3, 5, 6 and 8 of theConvention. This has been the key consideration informing the Review.3.0.3 The Review’s task has been to identify the fundamental principles that mustapply in a modern, fair and effective system for the investigation andprosecution of crime and to assess the extent to which existing law andpractice needs to be developed, adjusted or even overhauled in order tocomply with those principles. It is clear that many of the formulations ofthose principles must now be derived mainly, and sometimes perhapsexclusively, from the Convention. In addressing this dimension, the Reviewhas been conscious that there has to be developed a system which isConvention compliant overall and not just one containing an accumulation ofindividually compliant but unrelated constituent parts.3.0.4 The Convention itself is a concise and relatively clear text. As drafted, it is areadily understandable code of human rights, each of which is manifest fromthe express terms of the individual articles and sub-articles. But the rightshave been interpreted by the European Court in a manner which is appropriateto the particular circumstances of individual cases. There has developed anextensive jurisprudence of implied, subsidiary or supplementary rights which,although not explicitly recognised in the Convention, are taken by the Court toform part of the protections that it provides. In the context of the Article 6right to a fair trial, for example, there exists an implied right to silence, the50

privilege against self-incrimination and, post Salduz, the right of access to alawyer prior to police questioning in detention. Adding to the complexity,other rights may be express, such as the right under Article 5 to be brought“promptly” before a court, but those have been interpreted by the Court in ahighly flexible fashion.Article 5 – The Right to Liberty3.0.5 Article 5 states:“1. Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No oneshall be deprived of his liberty save in the following cases and inaccordance with a procedure prescribed by law:…the lawful arrest or detention of a person effected for the purpose ofbringing him before the competent legal authority on reasonablesuspicion of having committed an offence…;Everyone who is arrested shall be informed promptly, in a languagewhich he understands, of the reasons for his arrest and of any chargeagainst him.Everyone arrested or detained in accordance with the provisions ofparagraph 1(c) of this Article shall be brought promptly before a judgeor other officer authorised by law to exercise judicial power and shallbe entitled to trial within a reasonable time or to release pending trial.Release may be conditioned by guarantees to appear for trial”.3.0.6 The unnecessary or disproportionate deprivation of a person’s liberty is aserious infringement of his/her human rights. The circumstances in which anyarrest or detention can be tolerated as legitimate must be tightly constrained.It is a fact, however, that any criminal justice system must be able to deprive aperson of his/her liberty as part of the lawful protection of the rights of others51

The long term implication of this, which was highlighted in Cadder, is thatthere is a need to develop a system of criminal justice based on the protectionof human rights; in particular those contained in Articles 3, 5, 6 <strong>and</strong> 8 of theConvention. This has been the key consideration informing the Review.3.0.3 The Review’s task has been to identify the fundamental principles that mustapply in a modern, fair <strong>and</strong> effective system for the investigation <strong>and</strong>prosecution of crime <strong>and</strong> to assess the extent to which existing law <strong>and</strong>practice needs to be developed, adjusted or even overhauled in order tocomply with those principles. It is clear that many of the formulations ofthose principles must now be derived mainly, <strong>and</strong> sometimes perhapsexclusively, from the Convention. In addressing this dimension, the Reviewhas been conscious that there has to be developed a system which isConvention compliant overall <strong>and</strong> not just one containing an accumulation ofindividually compliant but unrelated constituent parts.3.0.4 The Convention itself is a concise <strong>and</strong> relatively clear text. As drafted, it is areadily underst<strong>and</strong>able code of human rights, each of which is manifest fromthe express terms of the individual articles <strong>and</strong> sub-articles. But the rightshave been interpreted by the European Court in a manner which is appropriateto the particular circumstances of individual cases. There has developed anextensive jurisprudence of implied, subsidiary or supplementary rights which,although not explicitly recognised in the Convention, are taken by the Court toform part of the protections that it provides. In the context of the Article 6right to a fair trial, for example, there exists an implied right to silence, the50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!