Report and Recommendations - Scottish Government

Annex GPeggie v Clark (1868) 7 M 89Platt v HM Advocate 2004 JC 113PF (Aberdeen) v Forrester [2011] HCJAC 71Pringle v PF (Dumbarton) 2011 SCCR 97Ralston v HM Advocate 1987 SCCR 467Reilly v HM Advocate1981 SCCR 201Rigg v HM Advocate 1946 JC 1Robertson v HM Advocate 1990 SCCR 142Robertson v MacDonald 1992 SCCR 916Robertson v Maxwell 1951 JC 11Rubin v HM Advocate 1984 SLT 369Scott v HM Advocate 1946 JC 90Scott v Jameson 1914 JC 187Shepherd v PF (Dornoch) [2010] HCJAC 114Smith v Lees 1997 JC 73Spence v HM Advocate 1945 JC 59Spendiff v HM Advocate 2005 JC 338Stark and Smith v HM Advocate 1938 JC 170Swankie v Milne 1973 JC 1Thomson v HM Advocate 2009 SCCR 415Thompson v Crowe 2000 JC 173Townsley v Lees 1996 SLT 1182Tudhope v Lawrie 1979 JC 44Uttley v HM Advocate [2009] HCJAC 95Wallace v Thomson 2009 SCCR 21Williamson v Wither 1981 SCCR 241Yates v HM Advocate 1990 JC 378nOther JurisdictionsAG v McCabe [1927] IR 129Betts and Hall [2001] 2 CrAppR 16Dental Board v O’Callaghan [1969] IR 181Doney v The Queen (1990) 171 CLR 207DPP v Healy [1990] 2 IR 73DPP v Hester [1973] AC 296F [1998] Crim LR 507Heaney v Ireland [1994] 1 IR 580Hussien v Chong Fook Kam [1970] AC 942Kuruma, Son of Kaniu v The Queen [1955] AC 197State of Madhya Pradesh v Ramesh and Anr, Supreme Court of India, 18 March 2011Manson [1988] 1 WLR 139Marcic v Thames Water Utilities [2004] 2 AC 42MFA v The Queen (2002) 213 CLR 606Miranda v Arizona (1966) 384 US 436M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487Mule v The Queen (2005) 221 ALR 85Nickolson [1999] Crim LR 61Owen v R [2007] NZSC 102Paris (1993) 97 Crim App Rep 99407