Report and Recommendations - Scottish Government
Report and Recommendations - Scottish Government Report and Recommendations - Scottish Government
power ought to be retained on the basis that it should continue to be availableto deal with circumstances which are truly extraordinary or unforeseen andwhere there is no other remedy available. But this is on the basis that the HighCourt is alert to the potential abuses which this equitable procedure can createif it is allowed to be used to challenge quorate final decisions of the HighCourt exhausting an appeal process or an application for leave to appeal interms of the 1995 Act.8.1.41 There is now an opportunity to simplify and modernise the current system ofcriminal appeals, making it less complex, more accessible and more efficientwithout compromising an individual’s right to appeal decisions that mayrequire to be reversed.RecommendationsI therefore recommend that:⎯ the High Court should be provided with a statutory provision toimpose sanctions, including that to dismiss an appeal or to order thatparticular steps should not be paid for out of public funds, to enforcetime limits and its own procedural decisions;⎯ the 1995 Act should be amended to provide that:(i) where an applicant fails to lodge a Note of Appeal timeously,having lodged a Notice of Intention to Appeal, his/her appeal willbe deemed to be abandoned;(ii) where an applicant seeks to lodge a Notice of Intention to Appeallate or seeks to have his/her abandoned appeal revived by lodginga Note of Appeal, having earlier failed to do so, the court mayallow this but only if:(a) special cause is shown why a late Notice or Note should beallowed; and(b) the grounds of appeal are such as disclose that, were theappeal to be received late, the appeal would probablysucceed on the grounds stated;352
(iii)discussions on whether to grant leave to appeal late shall all takeplace in chambers without the requirement of an oral hearingunless the Court otherwise directs; and(iv) the decision of the High Court refusing to allow a Notice ofIntention to Appeal or a Note of Appeal to be received late is final.;⎯ where an application for leave to appeal late is granted, the Courtmust give a reason for that decision in a form capable of beingcommunicated to any victim of the crime or next of kin of anydeceased;⎯ the processes of Bill of Suspension and Bill of Advocation should beabolished. The provisions of sections 74 and 174 of the 1995 Actshould be expanded to permit appeals from any pre trial decision of acourt of first instance but only with leave of that court. Where thedecision has the effect of terminating a prosecution by acquitting theaccused of a charge, or part of a charge, or otherwise the Crownshould have the right of appeal without leave;⎯ section 176 of the 1995 Act should be amended to permit an applicantfor a stated case based solely on the incompetency of a conviction torequest the court to authorise that the appeal proceed by Note ofAppeal rather than Stated Case. The court should be permitted togrant such authorisation. Other than in relation to the quorum of theCourt, the appeal should proceed in the same way as a Note of Appealagainst sentence;⎯ the same test for leave to appeal late as is suggested for solemn casesshould be applied to summary cases. It ought also to be made clearthat, in accordance with current practice, there is no appeal from thedecision of a single High Court judge refusing leave to appeal late in asummary case;⎯ the High Court’s nobile officium should continue but there should be astatutory provision that applies the same finality to summary caseappeal decisions that section 124 of the 1995 Act provides in relationto solemn cases; and⎯ further consideration by the court and the legal profession should begiven to whether the practice of trial counsel not appearing in theappeal proceedings constitutes a problem and, if so, what steps shouldbe taken to solve that problem.353
- Page 304 and 305: at least in connection with witness
- Page 306 and 307: with the complainer’s consent. By
- Page 308 and 309: Other jurisdictions7.4.7 The positi
- Page 310 and 311: evidence against him (i.e. presumab
- Page 312 and 313: fact on the other. This is especial
- Page 314 and 315: 7.4.17 The common law can certainly
- Page 316 and 317: 314
- Page 318 and 319: diet. Alternatively, a court may re
- Page 320 and 321: 7.5.8 If an accused does not give e
- Page 322 and 323: If the accused does not give eviden
- Page 324 and 325: England and Wales, Ireland, South A
- Page 326 and 327: Wales, be regarded at least as an a
- Page 328 and 329: is so even if seasoned offenders ma
- Page 330 and 331: inquisitorial systems, what occurs
- Page 332 and 333: SCCRC. The Review believes that, in
- Page 334 and 335: jurisprudence, it must be recognise
- Page 336 and 337: Current Law8.1.5 A person convicted
- Page 338 and 339: introduced. Thus, as had been indic
- Page 340 and 341: Late Appeals (solemn cases)8.1.12 A
- Page 342 and 343: Summary cases8.1.16 In summary proc
- Page 344 and 345: emedy is provided for by law” 49
- Page 346 and 347: ConsiderationSolemn Appeals8.1.23 T
- Page 348 and 349: why the application is late 66 . Fu
- Page 350 and 351: case may be, by advocation against
- Page 352 and 353: e achieved by amendment of section
- Page 356 and 357: 354
- Page 358 and 359: Thus, where there is a change of la
- Page 360 and 361: have his/her case referred back to
- Page 362 and 363: 8.2.9 It was perceived that there w
- Page 364 and 365: interests of justice, should be con
- Page 366 and 367: conviction be quashed. This applies
- Page 368 and 369: for undermining the important role
- Page 370 and 371: References to the High Court8.2.25
- Page 372 and 373: 370
- Page 374 and 375: 372Annex A
- Page 376 and 377: Annex AFiscal) to assess these case
- Page 378 and 379: Annex Aconviction, were the rule of
- Page 380 and 381: 378Annex A
- Page 382 and 383: Annex BRight of access to a lawyer
- Page 384 and 385: Annex BRight of access to a lawyer
- Page 386 and 387: Annex BPolice questioning after cha
- Page 388 and 389: 386Annex C
- Page 390 and 391: 388Annex D
- Page 392 and 393: Annex ELondon - 18 th -19 th May 20
- Page 394 and 395: Annex EConsultative Meetings - cont
- Page 396 and 397: Annex ESubgroup & individual meetin
- Page 398 and 399: Annex ESubgroup & individual meetin
- Page 400 and 401: Annex EConferences/SeminarsLord Car
- Page 402 and 403: Annex FTable 2 - Organisations that
(iii)discussions on whether to grant leave to appeal late shall all takeplace in chambers without the requirement of an oral hearingunless the Court otherwise directs; <strong>and</strong>(iv) the decision of the High Court refusing to allow a Notice ofIntention to Appeal or a Note of Appeal to be received late is final.;⎯ where an application for leave to appeal late is granted, the Courtmust give a reason for that decision in a form capable of beingcommunicated to any victim of the crime or next of kin of anydeceased;⎯ the processes of Bill of Suspension <strong>and</strong> Bill of Advocation should beabolished. The provisions of sections 74 <strong>and</strong> 174 of the 1995 Actshould be exp<strong>and</strong>ed to permit appeals from any pre trial decision of acourt of first instance but only with leave of that court. Where thedecision has the effect of terminating a prosecution by acquitting theaccused of a charge, or part of a charge, or otherwise the Crownshould have the right of appeal without leave;⎯ section 176 of the 1995 Act should be amended to permit an applicantfor a stated case based solely on the incompetency of a conviction torequest the court to authorise that the appeal proceed by Note ofAppeal rather than Stated Case. The court should be permitted togrant such authorisation. Other than in relation to the quorum of theCourt, the appeal should proceed in the same way as a Note of Appealagainst sentence;⎯ the same test for leave to appeal late as is suggested for solemn casesshould be applied to summary cases. It ought also to be made clearthat, in accordance with current practice, there is no appeal from thedecision of a single High Court judge refusing leave to appeal late in asummary case;⎯ the High Court’s nobile officium should continue but there should be astatutory provision that applies the same finality to summary caseappeal decisions that section 124 of the 1995 Act provides in relationto solemn cases; <strong>and</strong>⎯ further consideration by the court <strong>and</strong> the legal profession should begiven to whether the practice of trial counsel not appearing in theappeal proceedings constitutes a problem <strong>and</strong>, if so, what steps shouldbe taken to solve that problem.353