Report and Recommendations - Scottish Government

Report and Recommendations - Scottish Government Report and Recommendations - Scottish Government

lx.iriss.org.uk
from lx.iriss.org.uk More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

power ought to be retained on the basis that it should continue to be availableto deal with circumstances which are truly extraordinary or unforeseen andwhere there is no other remedy available. But this is on the basis that the HighCourt is alert to the potential abuses which this equitable procedure can createif it is allowed to be used to challenge quorate final decisions of the HighCourt exhausting an appeal process or an application for leave to appeal interms of the 1995 Act.8.1.41 There is now an opportunity to simplify and modernise the current system ofcriminal appeals, making it less complex, more accessible and more efficientwithout compromising an individual’s right to appeal decisions that mayrequire to be reversed.RecommendationsI therefore recommend that:⎯ the High Court should be provided with a statutory provision toimpose sanctions, including that to dismiss an appeal or to order thatparticular steps should not be paid for out of public funds, to enforcetime limits and its own procedural decisions;⎯ the 1995 Act should be amended to provide that:(i) where an applicant fails to lodge a Note of Appeal timeously,having lodged a Notice of Intention to Appeal, his/her appeal willbe deemed to be abandoned;(ii) where an applicant seeks to lodge a Notice of Intention to Appeallate or seeks to have his/her abandoned appeal revived by lodginga Note of Appeal, having earlier failed to do so, the court mayallow this but only if:(a) special cause is shown why a late Notice or Note should beallowed; and(b) the grounds of appeal are such as disclose that, were theappeal to be received late, the appeal would probablysucceed on the grounds stated;352

(iii)discussions on whether to grant leave to appeal late shall all takeplace in chambers without the requirement of an oral hearingunless the Court otherwise directs; and(iv) the decision of the High Court refusing to allow a Notice ofIntention to Appeal or a Note of Appeal to be received late is final.;⎯ where an application for leave to appeal late is granted, the Courtmust give a reason for that decision in a form capable of beingcommunicated to any victim of the crime or next of kin of anydeceased;⎯ the processes of Bill of Suspension and Bill of Advocation should beabolished. The provisions of sections 74 and 174 of the 1995 Actshould be expanded to permit appeals from any pre trial decision of acourt of first instance but only with leave of that court. Where thedecision has the effect of terminating a prosecution by acquitting theaccused of a charge, or part of a charge, or otherwise the Crownshould have the right of appeal without leave;⎯ section 176 of the 1995 Act should be amended to permit an applicantfor a stated case based solely on the incompetency of a conviction torequest the court to authorise that the appeal proceed by Note ofAppeal rather than Stated Case. The court should be permitted togrant such authorisation. Other than in relation to the quorum of theCourt, the appeal should proceed in the same way as a Note of Appealagainst sentence;⎯ the same test for leave to appeal late as is suggested for solemn casesshould be applied to summary cases. It ought also to be made clearthat, in accordance with current practice, there is no appeal from thedecision of a single High Court judge refusing leave to appeal late in asummary case;⎯ the High Court’s nobile officium should continue but there should be astatutory provision that applies the same finality to summary caseappeal decisions that section 124 of the 1995 Act provides in relationto solemn cases; and⎯ further consideration by the court and the legal profession should begiven to whether the practice of trial counsel not appearing in theappeal proceedings constitutes a problem and, if so, what steps shouldbe taken to solve that problem.353

(iii)discussions on whether to grant leave to appeal late shall all takeplace in chambers without the requirement of an oral hearingunless the Court otherwise directs; <strong>and</strong>(iv) the decision of the High Court refusing to allow a Notice ofIntention to Appeal or a Note of Appeal to be received late is final.;⎯ where an application for leave to appeal late is granted, the Courtmust give a reason for that decision in a form capable of beingcommunicated to any victim of the crime or next of kin of anydeceased;⎯ the processes of Bill of Suspension <strong>and</strong> Bill of Advocation should beabolished. The provisions of sections 74 <strong>and</strong> 174 of the 1995 Actshould be exp<strong>and</strong>ed to permit appeals from any pre trial decision of acourt of first instance but only with leave of that court. Where thedecision has the effect of terminating a prosecution by acquitting theaccused of a charge, or part of a charge, or otherwise the Crownshould have the right of appeal without leave;⎯ section 176 of the 1995 Act should be amended to permit an applicantfor a stated case based solely on the incompetency of a conviction torequest the court to authorise that the appeal proceed by Note ofAppeal rather than Stated Case. The court should be permitted togrant such authorisation. Other than in relation to the quorum of theCourt, the appeal should proceed in the same way as a Note of Appealagainst sentence;⎯ the same test for leave to appeal late as is suggested for solemn casesshould be applied to summary cases. It ought also to be made clearthat, in accordance with current practice, there is no appeal from thedecision of a single High Court judge refusing leave to appeal late in asummary case;⎯ the High Court’s nobile officium should continue but there should be astatutory provision that applies the same finality to summary caseappeal decisions that section 124 of the 1995 Act provides in relationto solemn cases; <strong>and</strong>⎯ further consideration by the court <strong>and</strong> the legal profession should begiven to whether the practice of trial counsel not appearing in theappeal proceedings constitutes a problem <strong>and</strong>, if so, what steps shouldbe taken to solve that problem.353

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!