Report and Recommendations - Scottish Government
Report and Recommendations - Scottish Government Report and Recommendations - Scottish Government
Summary cases8.1.16 In summary proceedings, there are no less than four potential modes of appeal:stated case (appeal against conviction), section 174 (preliminary rulings), Billof Suspension and Bill of Advocation. Bills of Suspension can normally onlybe employed to challenge final judgments 41 , i.e. at the conclusion of asummary trial 42 . They have traditionally been used in cases where the factsare not in dispute and there is a crisp issue of competency 43 . Advocation,although usually resorted to by the procurator fiscal, is available generally toreview decisions other than final judgments, again on the basis of someexceptional procedural irregularity 44 which cannot be remedied by an appealby stated case at the end of the trial process. It can, for example, be used toappeal against the grant or refusal of adjournments at trial diets.8.1.17 The applicant for leave to appeal against conviction requires to request a statedcase within one week of the final determination of the case 45 . Thereafter thereare a variety of time limits designed to expedite the summary stated caseprocess. The High Court may extend the time periods “as it may thinkproper” 46 and these applications are normally dealt with on paper by a singlejudge of the High Court in chambers. There is no appeal to a three judgebench against a refusal to extend a time limit in summary cases 47 .41 it can also be used to suspend warrants, a procedure outwith the scope of the Review42 Morton v Macleod 1981 SCCR 15943 Fairley v Muir 1951 JC 56, i.e. where the stated case procedure would be unnecessarily cumbersome44 see generally Renton & Brown : Criminal Procedure paras 33-19 et seq, especially 32-22 underreference to MacLeod v Levitt 1969 JC 16 and Durant v Lockhart 1985 SCCR 7245 1995 Act s 17646 1995 Act s 18147 ibid s181(3)340
8.1.18 In relation to preliminary rulings in the summary courts, there is a statutoryright of appeal, but only with leave of the court of first instance, within sevendays of the decision taken 48 . There is no power to extend this time limit.However, as in solemn cases, in the event of a conviction, the applicant can reraiseany matter dealt with by a preliminary ruling even although he/she didnot exercise his/her right of appeal, or was refused leave to do so, at the earlierstage. Accordingly, there is a right of appeal against conviction, which can beexercised late if the court deems that appropriate, and there is a right of appeal,with leave, in relation to preliminary rulings.Nobile Officium8.1.19 There have, over recent years, been several causes of delay in the progress ofappeals despite what ought to be a straightforward process. These can beprompted by late attempts to amend grounds of appeal and by late changes ofagency. These matters are primarily for the High Court to regulate in practice,provided that it is confident that it has the statutory powers to do so. What isof more concern is the invocation of the nobile officium of the High Court tochallenge decisions of that Court before, during and after the completion ofthe appeal process.8.1.20 Without indulging in an academic essay on the subject, the nobile officium isan ancient power of superintendence available to the High Court to deal withcircumstances which are “extraordinary or unforeseen and where no other48 ibid s 174 as amended prospectively by The Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Act 2010 s72341
- Page 292 and 293: neither a statutory nor a common la
- Page 294 and 295: trial judge, in determining whether
- Page 296 and 297: Other JurisdictionsSubmissions at T
- Page 298 and 299: 7.3.13 In Australia 29 :“…if th
- Page 300 and 301: Consideration7.3.18 There is a view
- Page 302 and 303: 300
- Page 304 and 305: at least in connection with witness
- Page 306 and 307: with the complainer’s consent. By
- Page 308 and 309: Other jurisdictions7.4.7 The positi
- Page 310 and 311: evidence against him (i.e. presumab
- Page 312 and 313: fact on the other. This is especial
- Page 314 and 315: 7.4.17 The common law can certainly
- Page 316 and 317: 314
- Page 318 and 319: diet. Alternatively, a court may re
- Page 320 and 321: 7.5.8 If an accused does not give e
- Page 322 and 323: If the accused does not give eviden
- Page 324 and 325: England and Wales, Ireland, South A
- Page 326 and 327: Wales, be regarded at least as an a
- Page 328 and 329: is so even if seasoned offenders ma
- Page 330 and 331: inquisitorial systems, what occurs
- Page 332 and 333: SCCRC. The Review believes that, in
- Page 334 and 335: jurisprudence, it must be recognise
- Page 336 and 337: Current Law8.1.5 A person convicted
- Page 338 and 339: introduced. Thus, as had been indic
- Page 340 and 341: Late Appeals (solemn cases)8.1.12 A
- Page 344 and 345: emedy is provided for by law” 49
- Page 346 and 347: ConsiderationSolemn Appeals8.1.23 T
- Page 348 and 349: why the application is late 66 . Fu
- Page 350 and 351: case may be, by advocation against
- Page 352 and 353: e achieved by amendment of section
- Page 354 and 355: power ought to be retained on the b
- Page 356 and 357: 354
- Page 358 and 359: Thus, where there is a change of la
- Page 360 and 361: have his/her case referred back to
- Page 362 and 363: 8.2.9 It was perceived that there w
- Page 364 and 365: interests of justice, should be con
- Page 366 and 367: conviction be quashed. This applies
- Page 368 and 369: for undermining the important role
- Page 370 and 371: References to the High Court8.2.25
- Page 372 and 373: 370
- Page 374 and 375: 372Annex A
- Page 376 and 377: Annex AFiscal) to assess these case
- Page 378 and 379: Annex Aconviction, were the rule of
- Page 380 and 381: 378Annex A
- Page 382 and 383: Annex BRight of access to a lawyer
- Page 384 and 385: Annex BRight of access to a lawyer
- Page 386 and 387: Annex BPolice questioning after cha
- Page 388 and 389: 386Annex C
- Page 390 and 391: 388Annex D
Summary cases8.1.16 In summary proceedings, there are no less than four potential modes of appeal:stated case (appeal against conviction), section 174 (preliminary rulings), Billof Suspension <strong>and</strong> Bill of Advocation. Bills of Suspension can normally onlybe employed to challenge final judgments 41 , i.e. at the conclusion of asummary trial 42 . They have traditionally been used in cases where the factsare not in dispute <strong>and</strong> there is a crisp issue of competency 43 . Advocation,although usually resorted to by the procurator fiscal, is available generally toreview decisions other than final judgments, again on the basis of someexceptional procedural irregularity 44 which cannot be remedied by an appealby stated case at the end of the trial process. It can, for example, be used toappeal against the grant or refusal of adjournments at trial diets.8.1.17 The applicant for leave to appeal against conviction requires to request a statedcase within one week of the final determination of the case 45 . Thereafter thereare a variety of time limits designed to expedite the summary stated caseprocess. The High Court may extend the time periods “as it may thinkproper” 46 <strong>and</strong> these applications are normally dealt with on paper by a singlejudge of the High Court in chambers. There is no appeal to a three judgebench against a refusal to extend a time limit in summary cases 47 .41 it can also be used to suspend warrants, a procedure outwith the scope of the Review42 Morton v Macleod 1981 SCCR 15943 Fairley v Muir 1951 JC 56, i.e. where the stated case procedure would be unnecessarily cumbersome44 see generally Renton & Brown : Criminal Procedure paras 33-19 et seq, especially 32-22 underreference to MacLeod v Levitt 1969 JC 16 <strong>and</strong> Durant v Lockhart 1985 SCCR 7245 1995 Act s 17646 1995 Act s 18147 ibid s181(3)340