Report and Recommendations - Scottish Government

Report and Recommendations - Scottish Government Report and Recommendations - Scottish Government

lx.iriss.org.uk
from lx.iriss.org.uk More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

Summary cases8.1.16 In summary proceedings, there are no less than four potential modes of appeal:stated case (appeal against conviction), section 174 (preliminary rulings), Billof Suspension and Bill of Advocation. Bills of Suspension can normally onlybe employed to challenge final judgments 41 , i.e. at the conclusion of asummary trial 42 . They have traditionally been used in cases where the factsare not in dispute and there is a crisp issue of competency 43 . Advocation,although usually resorted to by the procurator fiscal, is available generally toreview decisions other than final judgments, again on the basis of someexceptional procedural irregularity 44 which cannot be remedied by an appealby stated case at the end of the trial process. It can, for example, be used toappeal against the grant or refusal of adjournments at trial diets.8.1.17 The applicant for leave to appeal against conviction requires to request a statedcase within one week of the final determination of the case 45 . Thereafter thereare a variety of time limits designed to expedite the summary stated caseprocess. The High Court may extend the time periods “as it may thinkproper” 46 and these applications are normally dealt with on paper by a singlejudge of the High Court in chambers. There is no appeal to a three judgebench against a refusal to extend a time limit in summary cases 47 .41 it can also be used to suspend warrants, a procedure outwith the scope of the Review42 Morton v Macleod 1981 SCCR 15943 Fairley v Muir 1951 JC 56, i.e. where the stated case procedure would be unnecessarily cumbersome44 see generally Renton & Brown : Criminal Procedure paras 33-19 et seq, especially 32-22 underreference to MacLeod v Levitt 1969 JC 16 and Durant v Lockhart 1985 SCCR 7245 1995 Act s 17646 1995 Act s 18147 ibid s181(3)340

8.1.18 In relation to preliminary rulings in the summary courts, there is a statutoryright of appeal, but only with leave of the court of first instance, within sevendays of the decision taken 48 . There is no power to extend this time limit.However, as in solemn cases, in the event of a conviction, the applicant can reraiseany matter dealt with by a preliminary ruling even although he/she didnot exercise his/her right of appeal, or was refused leave to do so, at the earlierstage. Accordingly, there is a right of appeal against conviction, which can beexercised late if the court deems that appropriate, and there is a right of appeal,with leave, in relation to preliminary rulings.Nobile Officium8.1.19 There have, over recent years, been several causes of delay in the progress ofappeals despite what ought to be a straightforward process. These can beprompted by late attempts to amend grounds of appeal and by late changes ofagency. These matters are primarily for the High Court to regulate in practice,provided that it is confident that it has the statutory powers to do so. What isof more concern is the invocation of the nobile officium of the High Court tochallenge decisions of that Court before, during and after the completion ofthe appeal process.8.1.20 Without indulging in an academic essay on the subject, the nobile officium isan ancient power of superintendence available to the High Court to deal withcircumstances which are “extraordinary or unforeseen and where no other48 ibid s 174 as amended prospectively by The Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Act 2010 s72341

Summary cases8.1.16 In summary proceedings, there are no less than four potential modes of appeal:stated case (appeal against conviction), section 174 (preliminary rulings), Billof Suspension <strong>and</strong> Bill of Advocation. Bills of Suspension can normally onlybe employed to challenge final judgments 41 , i.e. at the conclusion of asummary trial 42 . They have traditionally been used in cases where the factsare not in dispute <strong>and</strong> there is a crisp issue of competency 43 . Advocation,although usually resorted to by the procurator fiscal, is available generally toreview decisions other than final judgments, again on the basis of someexceptional procedural irregularity 44 which cannot be remedied by an appealby stated case at the end of the trial process. It can, for example, be used toappeal against the grant or refusal of adjournments at trial diets.8.1.17 The applicant for leave to appeal against conviction requires to request a statedcase within one week of the final determination of the case 45 . Thereafter thereare a variety of time limits designed to expedite the summary stated caseprocess. The High Court may extend the time periods “as it may thinkproper” 46 <strong>and</strong> these applications are normally dealt with on paper by a singlejudge of the High Court in chambers. There is no appeal to a three judgebench against a refusal to extend a time limit in summary cases 47 .41 it can also be used to suspend warrants, a procedure outwith the scope of the Review42 Morton v Macleod 1981 SCCR 15943 Fairley v Muir 1951 JC 56, i.e. where the stated case procedure would be unnecessarily cumbersome44 see generally Renton & Brown : Criminal Procedure paras 33-19 et seq, especially 32-22 underreference to MacLeod v Levitt 1969 JC 16 <strong>and</strong> Durant v Lockhart 1985 SCCR 7245 1995 Act s 17646 1995 Act s 18147 ibid s181(3)340

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!