Report and Recommendations - Scottish Government

Report and Recommendations - Scottish Government Report and Recommendations - Scottish Government

lx.iriss.org.uk
from lx.iriss.org.uk More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

7.0.3 Throughout the course of the Review’s consultation and roadshows, somecontributors stated that issues around: sufficiency of evidence, includingcorroboration; the suspect’s right to not incriminate himself/herself; and theadmissibility of statements, were so interlaced within the system that theyshould not be contemplated without addressing a range of other issues,including other evidential rules or majority jury verdicts. The Review acceptsand agrees that the time taken to complete this report has meant that thenumber of areas which could be examined in detail was limited. However,this does not detract from the fact that the areas that have been explored showthat certain elements in the current criminal justice system do not match therequirements of modern society or allow for the flexibility that will be neededin the future.7.0.4 Before looking at how corroboration fits within the system, the Review felt itwas important to understand how corroboration as a requirement evolvedthrough our constantly changing society, up until the present day. Chapter 6.1– Corroboration – The Origins and Development, looks in detail at the historyof the requirement for corroboration in Europe and specifically in Scots law.7.0.5 Chapter 6.2 – Corroboration, examines how corroboration fits into thecriminal law framework and how what is considered by some to be acornerstone of our system is used as a safeguard of justice. This chapterexplores whether the requirement for corroboration may create barriers to, andpotentially miscarriages of, justice.It is acknowledged that therecommendation to remove the requirement for corroboration will attract236

particular comment and, no doubt, criticism. There may be furtherconsequences of abolition that will need to be worked through, as the criminaljustice system is progressively reformed. This is in the nature of law insociety. But the initial decision, which has to be taken, is whether, of itself,corroboration continues to contribute more than it detracts from a fair,efficient and effective system.7.0.6 In order to be able to analyse the issue of whether the requirement forcorroboration fits today’s society, independent research was commissioned toassess the impact of corroboration in the progress of criminal cases throughthe system. After thorough consideration of this research alongside all theother information, evidence and submissions on the subject, the Review is ableto recommend, with confidence, that the system would best be served byremoving the requirement.7.0.7 The consideration of guidance on what is sufficient evidence for the police toreport a case to the procurator fiscal is the responsibility of the Lord Advocateand this report does not make recommendations as to what direction theseshould take. Chapter 6.3 – Sufficiency of Evidence, does, however, look indetail at the current law on sufficiency of evidence at trial. The Reviewbelieves that the current system is both appropriate and robust enough tocontinue to work effectively and efficiently in today’s society, even with theremoval of the requirement for corroboration.237

particular comment <strong>and</strong>, no doubt, criticism. There may be furtherconsequences of abolition that will need to be worked through, as the criminaljustice system is progressively reformed. This is in the nature of law insociety. But the initial decision, which has to be taken, is whether, of itself,corroboration continues to contribute more than it detracts from a fair,efficient <strong>and</strong> effective system.7.0.6 In order to be able to analyse the issue of whether the requirement forcorroboration fits today’s society, independent research was commissioned toassess the impact of corroboration in the progress of criminal cases throughthe system. After thorough consideration of this research alongside all theother information, evidence <strong>and</strong> submissions on the subject, the Review is ableto recommend, with confidence, that the system would best be served byremoving the requirement.7.0.7 The consideration of guidance on what is sufficient evidence for the police toreport a case to the procurator fiscal is the responsibility of the Lord Advocate<strong>and</strong> this report does not make recommendations as to what direction theseshould take. Chapter 6.3 – Sufficiency of Evidence, does, however, look indetail at the current law on sufficiency of evidence at trial. The Reviewbelieves that the current system is both appropriate <strong>and</strong> robust enough tocontinue to work effectively <strong>and</strong> efficiently in today’s society, even with theremoval of the requirement for corroboration.237

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!