Report and Recommendations - Scottish Government
Report and Recommendations - Scottish Government Report and Recommendations - Scottish Government
he/she 9 : “may not understand the significance of what is said, of questions orof their replies”. If there is “any doubt” about this, the suspect should betreated as vulnerable. If the suspect is treated as vulnerable, the custodyofficer must contact an “appropriate adult”; being a relative or other personresponsible for his/her care or a person experienced in dealing with mentallyvulnerable people 10 . The appropriate adult must be told of the suspect’s rightof access to a lawyer and the suspect must be cautioned in his/her presence.The suspect ought to have been told of his/her right of access to a lawyer inadvance of this and contact with a solicitor is not to be delayed until the arrivalof the appropriate adult. The suspect may have a consultation with thesolicitor in the absence of the appropriate adult, if that is what he/she desires 11 .As a generality, a vulnerable suspect cannot be interviewed in the absence ofthe appropriate adult, who is advised that his/her role is not simply to act as anobserver but to advise the suspect, observe whether the interview is conductedproperly and fairly and to facilitate communication with the suspect 12 .6.4.10 In New South Wales, “vulnerable persons” include children, people withimpaired or intellectual functioning, Aboriginal persons and persons who arenot native English speakers 13 . All are entitled to the presence of a “supportperson” during the investigative procedures, although this entitlement can bewaived. Like the provisions under PACE, the support person is advised thathe/she is not restricted to acting as an observer at the interview but may assist9 PACE Code C, Note 1G, Para 1.4, there is also reference to the definition of disorder in the MentalHealth Act 1983 s 1(2)10 Annex E, paras 2 and 311 Note E112 ibid para 913 Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Regulations 2005 reg 24230
the suspect and identify any problems of communication 14 . In Ireland, avulnerable suspect is treated in a similar manner to children 15 .Consideration6.4.11 At the heart of this topic is the need to ensure that any suspect who isvulnerable: (i) is promptly identified as such, (ii) understands his/her rights;and (iii) is able to make informed decisions based on that understanding. InArticle 6 terms, it is the ability of the vulnerable suspect to understand thenature and potential effect of trial proceedings and to engage in them in ameaningful way that needs to be secured. This includes provision prior to, andat the stage of, a police interview. It is necessary that the suspect understandshis/her rights and is able to exercise them. It is essential that he/sheunderstands not only the questions asked and the answers given but also theimplications of what is being asked and of what he/she says in response.6.4.12 While there will be suspects whose vulnerability is patent, possibly alreadyrecorded and attributable to a particular condition, there may be some whosevulnerability is latent. Identifying vulnerability requires judgment by theinvestigating and custody officers. This is important, because it may be afactor to be taken into account in determining the overall fairness of theproceedings. Where an interview is deemed unfair because of inadequateprovision to deal with a person’s vulnerability, evidence of his/her answerswill be excluded as inadmissible, if objected to. However, there are few14 ibid reg 3015 The Criminal Justice Act (Treatment of Persons in Custody in Garda Siochana Stations) Regulations1987 (SI No 119) regs 22 and 13 (relating to children)231
- Page 182 and 183: sense, are inadmissible if objected
- Page 184 and 185: the suspect’s right to silence an
- Page 186 and 187: and reliable, e.g. to clear up ambi
- Page 188 and 189: “would have such an adverse effec
- Page 190 and 191: 6.2.38 As noted above, section 78 o
- Page 192 and 193: ensure that reasonable lines of enq
- Page 194 and 195: determining fairness in certain cas
- Page 196 and 197: permission to do so. The applicatio
- Page 198 and 199: hour maximum detention period, in a
- Page 200 and 201: incrimination. It should be specifi
- Page 202 and 203: accused’s first appearance on pet
- Page 204 and 205: 202
- Page 206 and 207: Current law6.3.4 For the purposes o
- Page 208 and 209: to a Hearing or prosecuted in court
- Page 210 and 211: ight of access to the child, subjec
- Page 212 and 213: Constabulary on the conditions in w
- Page 214 and 215: he/she has a specific right to “p
- Page 216 and 217: general thrust of what is said by t
- Page 218 and 219: 6.3.21 In many jurisdictions 43 a c
- Page 220 and 221: 6.3.25 This means that any child su
- Page 222 and 223: police interviewing a child at his
- Page 224 and 225: to listen to any advice given. If h
- Page 226 and 227: 224
- Page 228 and 229: Current LawDefinition6.4.3 There is
- Page 230 and 231: legislation 6 , both of which stres
- Page 234 and 235: specific statutory rules which make
- Page 236 and 237: of his/her replies because of an ap
- Page 238 and 239: 7.0.3 Throughout the course of the
- Page 240 and 241: 7.0.8 The Review looked at the admi
- Page 242 and 243: 240
- Page 244 and 245: which does not hold when there is a
- Page 246 and 247: We have already directed that witne
- Page 248 and 249: persuade the populace of the validi
- Page 250 and 251: punishments than those exigible on
- Page 252 and 253: tenets. Indeed, even the judiciary
- Page 254 and 255: He concluded 50 :“Although two wi
- Page 256 and 257: does then, in each individual case,
- Page 258 and 259: will look at the evidence at trial
- Page 260 and 261: accused as the perpetrator of the c
- Page 262 and 263: 7.2.11 After what might be describe
- Page 264 and 265: Practical Considerations7.2.15 How
- Page 266 and 267: 7.2.18 It may seem immediately appa
- Page 268 and 269: Distress7.2.21 Similar consideratio
- Page 270 and 271: The Convention7.2.23 Article 6 of t
- Page 272 and 273: 7.2.25 The rules concerning the nee
- Page 274 and 275: finding tribunals are, with rare ex
- Page 276 and 277: cases which had been instructed for
- Page 278 and 279: the criminal justice system. Removi
- Page 280 and 281: The more difficult issue, however,
he/she 9 : “may not underst<strong>and</strong> the significance of what is said, of questions orof their replies”. If there is “any doubt” about this, the suspect should betreated as vulnerable. If the suspect is treated as vulnerable, the custodyofficer must contact an “appropriate adult”; being a relative or other personresponsible for his/her care or a person experienced in dealing with mentallyvulnerable people 10 . The appropriate adult must be told of the suspect’s rightof access to a lawyer <strong>and</strong> the suspect must be cautioned in his/her presence.The suspect ought to have been told of his/her right of access to a lawyer inadvance of this <strong>and</strong> contact with a solicitor is not to be delayed until the arrivalof the appropriate adult. The suspect may have a consultation with thesolicitor in the absence of the appropriate adult, if that is what he/she desires 11 .As a generality, a vulnerable suspect cannot be interviewed in the absence ofthe appropriate adult, who is advised that his/her role is not simply to act as anobserver but to advise the suspect, observe whether the interview is conductedproperly <strong>and</strong> fairly <strong>and</strong> to facilitate communication with the suspect 12 .6.4.10 In New South Wales, “vulnerable persons” include children, people withimpaired or intellectual functioning, Aboriginal persons <strong>and</strong> persons who arenot native English speakers 13 . All are entitled to the presence of a “supportperson” during the investigative procedures, although this entitlement can bewaived. Like the provisions under PACE, the support person is advised thathe/she is not restricted to acting as an observer at the interview but may assist9 PACE Code C, Note 1G, Para 1.4, there is also reference to the definition of disorder in the MentalHealth Act 1983 s 1(2)10 Annex E, paras 2 <strong>and</strong> 311 Note E112 ibid para 913 Law Enforcement (Powers <strong>and</strong> Responsibilities) Regulations 2005 reg 24230