12.07.2015 Views

IELTS Research Reports

IELTS Research Reports

IELTS Research Reports

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

An empirical investigation of the process of writing Academic Readingtest items for the International English Language Testing Systemunrewarding) experience composing objective-format usage of English items which she had preparedduring her experience in publishing.The participants were then asked whether their experience with the research project commission hadchanged their opinions of the <strong>IELTS</strong> reading paper. Victoria had found herself asking more about theactual process of reading, her answers to this question underlining why <strong>IELTS</strong> academic reading wassuch ‘a tough exam’ for candidates. Mathilda had become more curious about how the test was usedactually to measure proficiency, something she feels must be difficult to ‘pin down’. Mary feels moretolerant of <strong>IELTS</strong> texts that may appear boring, given the difficulty she experienced finding her owntext for the project. All three participants would welcome further experience with <strong>IELTS</strong> academicreading item writing, especially the training for it.4.2 Procedures with and Findings from the experienced <strong>IELTS</strong> Item Writer GroupSession 1: experienced item writer participant discussion of their experience with their commission toselect an appropriate <strong>IELTS</strong> academic reading text, edit and adapt for testing purposes and generatetest itemsAs with the non-experienced group, the four experienced participants discussed this commission toselect an appropriate <strong>IELTS</strong> academic reading text, edit and adapt for testing purposes and generatetest items, but this group was also, of course, able to discuss the regular experience of carrying out<strong>IELTS</strong> item writing commissions. Again this was organised as a researcher-led discussion session.Each participant (see Table 11 in Appendix B for background information) was invited to describe theprocesses through which an ‘<strong>IELTS</strong>’ text was selected and adapted, and then reading test items created.Again, both researchers were present, but intervened only infrequently and informally. All proceedingswere recorded (see above).4.2.1 Participant text search treatment and item development: flowchartsand discussionsThe experiential information provided orally by the four participants is summarised in Table 5,which analyses responses on the issue of text sources.Source/ Influence?Item WriterJane Anne William Elizabeth<strong>IELTS</strong> Guidelines or Commission √ √ √ √Own interest√Web √ √ √ √Magazines, journals √ √Newspapers√Bookshops√Table 5. Experienced Participants: Sources and influences re <strong>IELTS</strong> academic reading moduletext selectionUnlike the non-experienced writers, this group did not mention the <strong>IELTS</strong> website or published <strong>IELTS</strong>material as a source of information on text selection. All reported that they referred to the item writerguidelines and to specific recommendations on topics made in the <strong>IELTS</strong> commissioning process.<strong>IELTS</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Reports</strong> Volume 11287

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!