12.07.2015 Views

North Peoria Area Drainage Master Plan - Flood Control District of ...

North Peoria Area Drainage Master Plan - Flood Control District of ...

North Peoria Area Drainage Master Plan - Flood Control District of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NORTH PEORIAAREA DRAINAGE MASTER PLANheadwater ponding, discharge <strong>of</strong> clearwater may result in degradation downstreamuntil the channel slope adjusts tothe new sediment supply. Culverts shallbe designed so that the disruptions to thenatural sediment transport capabilities <strong>of</strong>the wash are minimized.BridgesBridges that span the floodplain typicallyhave no measurable impact on channel stability,as evidenced by the channel conditionsobserved at the Beardsley Canal flumes overCaterpillar Tank Wash and Twin Buttes Washwithin the <strong>North</strong> <strong>Peoria</strong> ADMP study area.Bridges with narrow openings are functionallylike a culvert, and have the impacts onchannel stability described above.([DPSOHRI+HDGZDOO&RQVWUXFWHGRI1DWLYH0DWHULDOOversized (relative to natural channel andfloodplain geometry) culverts structures,which increase the width <strong>of</strong> the natural channelin order to minimize the height or depth <strong>of</strong>ponding, can also have detrimental impacts toboth upstream and down stream properties.The impacts <strong>of</strong> oversized culverts on channelstability include the following:• Long-term Aggradation. Increasing thenatural width <strong>of</strong> a channel to accommodatea culvert structure would change thesediment transport capacity <strong>of</strong> the channel.During frequent events or eventslesser than the design capacity <strong>of</strong> the culvertstructure sediment would be depositedin the section <strong>of</strong> channel that has beenwidened. Accumulation <strong>of</strong> sedimentwould decease both the capacity <strong>of</strong> thechannel and the capacity <strong>of</strong> the structureultimately resulting in flooding impacts toadjacent properties. Culvert span (width)should be as wide as the main channel(top <strong>of</strong> left bank to top <strong>of</strong> right bank)where channels are well defined. Culvertsthat do not obstruct the main channel willhave less frequent impacts on channel stabilitythan culverts that block the mainchannel.38([DPSOHRID%ULGJH6WUXFWXUH&ORJJHGZLWK6HGLPHQWBased on theirlikely impactson channelstability, thefollowingguidelines forroadwaycrossingdesign are recommendedfor watercourses in the <strong>North</strong><strong>Peoria</strong> ADMP study area:• Bridges are preferable to culverts. Bridgestypically have less impact on channel stabilitythan culverts due to the wider openingand decreased likelihood <strong>of</strong> headwaterponding.• Bridge span (width) at a minimum shouldbe as wide as the channel or floodway limits,preferably as wide as the floodplain orerosion hazard zone where channels arewell defined. Bridges that do not obstructthe main channel will have less frequentimpacts on channel stability than culvertsthat block the main channel.• Where braided or multiple channels exist,relief structures outside <strong>of</strong> the main channelshould be provided to maintain overbankflow paths, preserve overbankconveyance, and prevent floodplain sedimentation;instead <strong>of</strong> widening one <strong>of</strong> themultiple channels to provide conveyance<strong>of</strong> the design event at one location.• Bridge crossings should be regularlymaintained and inspected to identifypotential problems and impacts to channel

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!