the purpose <strong>of</strong> watershed and watercoursemanagement.Biological ResourcesGoal BR1 - Preserve sensitive habitats within the<strong>North</strong> <strong>Peoria</strong> ADMP <strong>Peoria</strong> project area.Objective BR1.1The reach <strong>of</strong> perennial flow for MorganCity Wash and Agua Fria River and theadjacent riparian habitats should be protectedfrom future development in orderto maintain the ecological integrity andintact condition <strong>of</strong> these habitats.Policy BR1.1.1Encourage that developers contact theArizona Game and Fish Departmentfor specific development design considerationsfor areas adjacent to theperennial flow reach for Morgan CityWash and the Agua Fria River locatedin the Morgan City <strong>Area</strong>.Objective BR1.2Riparian vegetation habitats should bepreserved along major washes in the MorganCity, Big Spring, East Terrace, andTwin Buttes areas to enhance bank stability,to decrease lateral erosion, and tomaintain the existing sediment balance <strong>of</strong>streams.Policy BR1.2.1Recommend that vegetation and anadjacent buffer zone be preservedalong major washes.Desert Lands Conservation <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>(August 1999), and the Lake Pleasant/<strong>North</strong><strong>Peoria</strong> <strong>Area</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> (November 1999).Visual CharacterGoal VC1 - Maintain the existing visual character(natural, historic) <strong>of</strong> the region.Objective VC1.1Minimize the visual impact <strong>of</strong> stormwaterstorage facilities.Policy VC1.4.1Encourage that stormwater storagefacilities be designed to appear in conformancewith the natural contoursand alignment <strong>of</strong> the terrain.Objective VC1.2Encourage maintenance <strong>of</strong> the naturalwash side-slope texture and color in areas<strong>of</strong> disturbance.Policy VC1.2.1Where constructed, flood control facilitiesand side-slope stabilization measuresshould match the adjacentterrain in color and texture.Objective VC1.3Minimize the number <strong>of</strong> wash crossings inorder to prevent disrupting views up ordown the wash. Minimize impacts toplant and animal habitats, and avoid disturbingthe existing sediment balance,decrease the need for public maintenanceand minimize scour and deposition.Other applicable policies and guidelines forpreservation <strong>of</strong> sensitive habitats, buffer areasadjacent to riparianriparian corridors, preservation<strong>of</strong> significant stands <strong>of</strong> representativeplant communities and revegetation <strong>of</strong> disturbedareas are presented in the Comprehensive<strong>Plan</strong>-Maricopa County Eye to the Future2020 (1997), and the ESDA (June 2000) forareas within Maricopa County. For areaswithin the City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Peoria</strong>, applicable policiesand guidelines are presented in the City <strong>of</strong><strong>Peoria</strong>’s General <strong>Plan</strong> (June 2001), <strong>Peoria</strong>25Policy VC1.3.1Where utility, trails, or roadway crossingsare necessary, cross perpendicularto wash, at the narrowest point and/orat the point <strong>of</strong> least vegetation disturbance.Policy VC1.3.2Replant disturbed areas using existingnative plant species types and densitiesthat are consistent with existingconditions.
NORTH PEORIAAREA DRAINAGE MASTER PLANOther applicable policies and guidelines forpreservation <strong>of</strong> landform visual resources arepresented in the Comprehensive <strong>Plan</strong>-MaricopaCounty Eye to the Future 2020 (1997),Maricopa County’s Zoning Ordinance (HillsideDevelopment Standards (August 1993))and the ESDA (June 2000) for areas withinMaricopa County. For areas within the City <strong>of</strong><strong>Peoria</strong>, applicable policies and guidelines arepresented in the City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Peoria</strong>’s General <strong>Plan</strong>(June 2001), <strong>Peoria</strong> Desert Lands Conservation<strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> (August 1999), Lake Pleasant/<strong>North</strong> <strong>Peoria</strong> <strong>Area</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> (November 1999),Zoning Ordinance (September 1995 (HillsideDevelopment Overlay <strong>District</strong>)).Cultural ResourcesOur cultural resources inform us <strong>of</strong> prehistoricand historic cultures and cultural changethrough time. Both Maricopa County and theCity <strong>of</strong> <strong>Peoria</strong> recognize the importance <strong>of</strong> culturalresources and have adopted conservationand preservation policies that strive toprotect our cultural resources. Applicable policiesand guidelines for the identification, protectionand conservation <strong>of</strong> cultural resourcesare presented in the City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Peoria</strong>’s General<strong>Plan</strong> (June 2001), Comprehensive <strong>Plan</strong>-MaricopaCounty Eye to the Future 2020 (1997),and Maricopa County’s Desert Spaces <strong>Plan</strong>(1995).Multiple-Use OpportunitiesAs an element <strong>of</strong> the <strong>North</strong> <strong>Peoria</strong> ADMP, anassessment <strong>of</strong> opportunities and limitationsfor integrating multiple-use recreational featuresinto preferred flood control managementalternatives was conducted.26Opportunities identified are primarily locatedalong Morgan City Wash in the Morgan City<strong>Area</strong>, Unnamed Washes 1, 2, and 3 in the BigSpring <strong>Area</strong>, and Caterpillar Wash and TwinButtes Wash in the Twin Buttes <strong>Area</strong>. Thelocation <strong>of</strong> multiple–use recreational facilities(identified as part <strong>of</strong> this study) along thesewash corridors are primarily limited to the100-year floodplain and/or erosion hazardzone and possible detention/retention facilities,located within a wash, that may be constructedby developers. Multiple-useopportunities constraints are the physicaldimensions <strong>of</strong> the 100-year floodplain anderosion hazard zone and steep terrain. Washcorridors in the Morgan City Wash <strong>Area</strong>, BigSpring <strong>Area</strong>, and the Twin Buttes <strong>Area</strong> abovethe CAP canal are typified by incised channels,steep banks, narrow floodway limits thatare coincidental with floodplain limits (minimumdevelopment potential with floodplain)and erosion hazard zones that are not significantlydifferent than the 100-year floodplainlimits. Twin Buttes below the CAP Canal ischaracterized by a wider floodplain and erosionhazard zone than the reach above theCAP. Given the 100-year floodplain and erosionhazard zone dimensions and steep terrainconstraints multiple-use opportunitiesassociated with flood control managementalternatives are primarily limited to trails andopen space located within a wash corridor(the wider the floodplain/erosion hazardzone the greater the opportunity). Multiple-Use opportunities could be enhanced by planningrecreational facilities located outside <strong>of</strong>the wash corridor that connect to potentialtrail systems/open space areas within andadjacent to a watercourse.<strong>Plan</strong>ning efforts for multiple-use recreationalfacilities in the <strong>North</strong> <strong>Peoria</strong> ADMP shallinclude where merited the incorporation <strong>of</strong>guidelines and standards developed for theCity <strong>of</strong> <strong>Peoria</strong> and Maricopa County in variousplanning documents that include, the City<strong>of</strong> <strong>Peoria</strong>’s Trails <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> (January 1999)and River <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> (January 1999), the<strong>Flood</strong> <strong>Control</strong> <strong>District</strong>s Agua Fria Watercourse<strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> (2001), Maricopa County’s, Highway74 Scenic Corridor Overlay Zoning OrdinanceXXII-F-1, (August 1993) and, MaricopaCounty’s Parks and Recreation Department,Proposed Maricopa County Regional TrailSystem (on going).The following general goals are <strong>of</strong>fered asopportunities to meet local community needsfor recreation and open space. Specific objectivesand policies are not developed as part <strong>of</strong>