North Peoria Area Drainage Master Plan - Flood Control District of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

TABLE OF CONTENTSPreface ....................................................................................................................................................... iiiAcknowledgements ..................................................................................................................................vList of Figures ...........................................................................................................................................viList of Tables .......................................................................................................................................... viiIntroduction ............................................................................................................................................... 1Purpose and Goals .................................................................................................................................... 2Background ................................................................................................................................................ 3Project Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3Land Ownership . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4Land Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4Regional and Local Planning Efforts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4Peoria General Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5Lake Pleasant/North Peoria Area Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5Peoria Desert Lands Conservation Master Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5White Tanks/Grand Avenue Area Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5Desert Spaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5Desert Spaces-Environmentally Sensitive Development Areas . . . . . . . . . 6Environmental Hazards Identification ................................................................................................. 6Hydrology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6Hydraulics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7Geomorphic Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8Sediment Engineering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8Flood and Erosion Hazard Zones . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9Environmental Characteristics ............................................................................................................... 9Biological Resource Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9Cultural Resources Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10Landscape Character and Visual Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11Multiple-Use Opportunities ................................................................................................................. 12Public Involvement ................................................................................................................................ 13Flood Control Management Alternatives Development and Evaluation .................................... 13Flood Control Management Alternatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13Alternative Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15Public Safety Criterion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15Social Criterion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15Environmental Criterion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16Economic Criterion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17i
NORTH PEORIAAREA DRAINAGE MASTER PLANSummary of Evaluation Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17Preferred Flood Control Management Alternatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19Compatibility with Other Planning Documents .............................................................................. 19Rules of Development ........................................................................................................................... 21Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21North Peoria Area Drainage Master Plan Elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21Environmental Hazards Identification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22Development/Planning Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24Biological Resources . . . . . . . . . . . 25Visual Character . . . . . . . . . . . 25Cultural Resources . . . . . . . . . . . 26Multiple-Use Opportunities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26Design Guidelines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27Flood Hazards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27Erosion Hazards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27Typical Scope of Work for Detailed Erosion Hazard Analysis . . . . 28Technical Analysis Work Plan . . . . . . . . . 28Final Product . . . . . . . . . . . . 31Earthen Dams (Stock Tanks) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32Retention/Detention Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32Standard Retention Practice . . . . . . . . . 32In-stream, In-Line Detention Basins . . . . . . . . 32In-stream, Off-line Retention Basin . . . . . . . . 33Floodplain Encroachment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34Low Impact Structural Alternative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35Channelization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35Roadway Crossing Drainage Structures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36At-Grade Crossings . . . . . . . . . . . 36Culverts . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37Bridges . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38Utility Crossings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39Aesthetic Design Guidelines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39Structural Erosion Protection Measures . . . . . . . 39Channels . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39Drainage Structures . . . . . . . . . . . 40Maintenance Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40Maintenance Plan ................................................................................................................................... 40Considerations for Existing Structures in Flood Hazard Areas ..................................................... 40General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40Glossary .................................................................................................................................................... 42References ................................................................................................................................................ 44ii
Page 4: PREFACEAt the request of the City o
Page 8 and 9: LIST OF TABLESTable 1: Regional and
Page 10 and 11: INTRODUCTIONThe natural physical ch
Page 12 and 13: minimize the effect of urbanization
Page 14 and 15: Peoria General PlanThe Peoria Gener
Page 16 and 17: HYDRAULICS8QQDPHG:DVK%LJ6SULQJHydra
Page 18 and 19: FLOOD AND EROSION HAZARD ZONESWith
Page 20 and 21: ing them before they are destroyed
Page 22 and 23: PUBLIC INVOLVEMENTAn integral part
Page 24 and 25: hard pan, typically less than two f
Page 26 and 27: Economic CriterionThe evaluation of
Page 28 and 29: Table 4Summary of Evaluation Result
Page 30 and 31: INTRODUCTIONRULES OF DEVELOPMENTCom
Page 32 and 33: Objective EH1.3Identify erosion haz
Page 34 and 35: the purpose of watershed and waterc
Page 36 and 37: the North Peoria ADMP. Users of the
Page 38 and 39: (short, constricted reaches), backw
Page 40 and 41: • Collect hydrologic data - peak
Page 42 and 43: • Basin Outlet (Culvert). The bas
Page 44 and 45: Low Impact Structural AlternativeFo
Page 46 and 47: ack at the natural channel bed. In
Page 48 and 49: stability, and to assure structure
Page 50 and 51: developed for the Estrella Roadway,
Page 52 and 53:
gabion mattressA gabion mattress is
Page 54 and 55:
Maricopa County, August 21, 1993, H
Page 70 and 71:
100-year W.S. ElevationBufferFEMA 1
Page 72 and 73:
NORTH PEORIA AREA DRAINAGE MASTER P
Page 74:
100-year W.S. ElevationFEMA 100-yea
show all

North Peoria Area Drainage Master Plan - Flood Control District of ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?