North Peoria Area Drainage Master Plan - Flood Control District of ...
North Peoria Area Drainage Master Plan - Flood Control District of ... North Peoria Area Drainage Master Plan - Flood Control District of ...
Table 4Summary of Evaluation Results Stormwater Storage Based AlternativesPlanningAreaEvaluationCriteriaWeightingFactorIn-Stream, Off-LineRetentionIn-Stream, In-LineDetentionRating Score Rating Score1 2 3 4 5 6 7Big Spring Public Safety 10 7 68 6 64Social 3 11 34 10 31Environmental 6 10 60 9 53Economic 4 6 24 6 24Total Score = 186 172hour event is not practical. Scoring results forthe stormwater storage are listed in Table 4.PREFERRED FLOOD CONTROL MANAGEMENTALTERNATIVESThe preferred watercourse-based flood controlmanagement alternative is the non-structuralalternative. The non-structuralalternative defines a corridor that allows thewatercourse to function naturally and isdefined by the 100-year floodplain, erosionhazard zone and a buffer if applicablebetween human activity and a wash corridor.The plan recognizes that there may be situationsin which development activities may berequired or desired within the erosion hazardzone, for this situation the plan presents a lowimpact structural alternative. Channelizationis not a preferred flood control managementalternative; however, the plan also recognizesthat there may be situations in which channelizationmay be required. The preferred stormwaterstorage alternative is the standardpractice of retaining the volume from the 100-year, 2-hour rainfall event, however this practicemay not be practical for certain portions ofthe study area. The standard retention practicesif implemented within an entire watershedwould have negative impacts in regardsto sustaining native vegetation along watercourses.The plan offers two stormwaterreduction alternatives to the standard practice.The stormwater storage alternatives are basedon reducing post-development peak dischargesto pre-development magnitudes. Thealternatives are referred to as the in-stream,off-line retention alternative and in-stream, inlinedetention alternative. The in-stream, offlineretention is the preferred alternative of thetwo.COMPATIBILITY WITH OTHERPLANNING DOCUMENTSComponents of preferred flood control managementalternatives are compared to componentsof environmental resources, safety, andopen space elements of other planning documentsto ensure that there is consistencybetween the intent of the North Peoria ADMPand the intent of other planning documents.Table 5 lists the themes of objectives and policiesfrom the North Peoria ADMP and otherapplicable planning documents that have similargoals.19
NORTH PEORIAAREA DRAINAGE MASTER PLANTable 5Summary of Regional and Local Planning ObjectivesPlanning Document Objective PoliciesDiscourage Development within 100-yearfloodplain in Environmentally Sensitive AreasDisrourage Development withinErosion Hazard ZonesEncourage the Use of Non-Structural FloodControl Management Techniques Where ApplicablePromote the Design of Flood Control Structures thatare Sensitive to the Natural EnvironmentManage Increases in Stormwater Runoffdue to UrbanizationChanges to Natural Drainage Patterns Should beAvoided in Environmentally Sensitive Land AreasAppropriate Structures Should beDesigned for Roadway Cross DrainageRecognition/Preservation of Unique LandformsDesignation of Environmentally Sensitive AreasRecommend Development Guidelines that areSensitive to the Natural EnvironmentPreserve and Protect Habitat Areas and Areasof Vegetative SignificancePreserve and Protect Historical andArchaeological ResourcesRecognize Multiple-Use RecreationalOpportunities within an Open Space NetworkEstablish Buffer Between Human Activities andEnvironmentally Sensitive AreasRecommend that Special Development Guidelinesfor Area with Terrain Slopes Greater than 10%(City of Peoria) or 15% (Maricopa County).City of Peoria’s General Plan (June2001)Lake Pleasant/North Peoria AreaPlan (November 1999)X X X X X X X X X X XX X X X X X X X X X X XPeoria Desert Lands ConvervationX X X X X X X X XMaster Plan (August 1999)Desert Spaces (1995) X X X X X X X X X X X XWhite Tank Grand Avenue Area SpecificPlan (December 6, 2000)North Peoria Area Drainage MasterPlan (2001)X X X X X XX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X20
- Page 2 and 3: TABLE OF CONTENTSPreface ..........
- Page 4: PREFACEAt the request of the City o
- Page 8 and 9: LIST OF TABLESTable 1: Regional and
- Page 10 and 11: INTRODUCTIONThe natural physical ch
- Page 12 and 13: minimize the effect of urbanization
- Page 14 and 15: Peoria General PlanThe Peoria Gener
- Page 16 and 17: HYDRAULICS8QQDPHG:DVK%LJ6SULQJHydra
- Page 18 and 19: FLOOD AND EROSION HAZARD ZONESWith
- Page 20 and 21: ing them before they are destroyed
- Page 22 and 23: PUBLIC INVOLVEMENTAn integral part
- Page 24 and 25: hard pan, typically less than two f
- Page 26 and 27: Economic CriterionThe evaluation of
- Page 30 and 31: INTRODUCTIONRULES OF DEVELOPMENTCom
- Page 32 and 33: Objective EH1.3Identify erosion haz
- Page 34 and 35: the purpose of watershed and waterc
- Page 36 and 37: the North Peoria ADMP. Users of the
- Page 38 and 39: (short, constricted reaches), backw
- Page 40 and 41: • Collect hydrologic data - peak
- Page 42 and 43: • Basin Outlet (Culvert). The bas
- Page 44 and 45: Low Impact Structural AlternativeFo
- Page 46 and 47: ack at the natural channel bed. In
- Page 48 and 49: stability, and to assure structure
- Page 50 and 51: developed for the Estrella Roadway,
- Page 52 and 53: gabion mattressA gabion mattress is
- Page 54 and 55: Maricopa County, August 21, 1993, H
- Page 70 and 71: 100-year W.S. ElevationBufferFEMA 1
- Page 72 and 73: NORTH PEORIA AREA DRAINAGE MASTER P
- Page 74: 100-year W.S. ElevationFEMA 100-yea
NORTH PEORIAAREA DRAINAGE MASTER PLANTable 5Summary <strong>of</strong> Regional and Local <strong>Plan</strong>ning Objectives<strong>Plan</strong>ning Document Objective PoliciesDiscourage Development within 100-yearfloodplain in Environmentally Sensitive <strong>Area</strong>sDisrourage Development withinErosion Hazard ZonesEncourage the Use <strong>of</strong> Non-Structural <strong>Flood</strong><strong>Control</strong> Management Techniques Where ApplicablePromote the Design <strong>of</strong> <strong>Flood</strong> <strong>Control</strong> Structures thatare Sensitive to the Natural EnvironmentManage Increases in Stormwater Run<strong>of</strong>fdue to UrbanizationChanges to Natural <strong>Drainage</strong> Patterns Should beAvoided in Environmentally Sensitive Land <strong>Area</strong>sAppropriate Structures Should beDesigned for Roadway Cross <strong>Drainage</strong>Recognition/Preservation <strong>of</strong> Unique LandformsDesignation <strong>of</strong> Environmentally Sensitive <strong>Area</strong>sRecommend Development Guidelines that areSensitive to the Natural EnvironmentPreserve and Protect Habitat <strong>Area</strong>s and <strong>Area</strong>s<strong>of</strong> Vegetative SignificancePreserve and Protect Historical andArchaeological ResourcesRecognize Multiple-Use RecreationalOpportunities within an Open Space NetworkEstablish Buffer Between Human Activities andEnvironmentally Sensitive <strong>Area</strong>sRecommend that Special Development Guidelinesfor <strong>Area</strong> with Terrain Slopes Greater than 10%(City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Peoria</strong>) or 15% (Maricopa County).City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Peoria</strong>’s General <strong>Plan</strong> (June2001)Lake Pleasant/<strong>North</strong> <strong>Peoria</strong> <strong>Area</strong><strong>Plan</strong> (November 1999)X X X X X X X X X X XX X X X X X X X X X X X<strong>Peoria</strong> Desert Lands ConvervationX X X X X X X X X<strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> (August 1999)Desert Spaces (1995) X X X X X X X X X X X XWhite Tank Grand Avenue <strong>Area</strong> Specific<strong>Plan</strong> (December 6, 2000)<strong>North</strong> <strong>Peoria</strong> <strong>Area</strong> <strong>Drainage</strong> <strong>Master</strong><strong>Plan</strong> (2001)X X X X X XX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X20
Change language