12.07.2015 Views

Civil Grand Jury report - Superior Court of California

Civil Grand Jury report - Superior Court of California

Civil Grand Jury report - Superior Court of California

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

City and County <strong>of</strong> San Francisco2012-2013 <strong>Civil</strong> <strong>Grand</strong> <strong>Jury</strong>Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association (SPUR), and the BPR <strong>report</strong> allhave noted that DBI lacks a strategic plan which would set priorities, focus energy andresources, ensure that employees are working toward common goals, and adjustoperations in response to a changing environment. 25The DBI has had a revolving door <strong>of</strong> directors, with five in the past seven years and, as <strong>of</strong>our <strong>report</strong>, an acting director for a year. Such turnover in the director’s position and theshuffling <strong>of</strong> managers, sometimes out <strong>of</strong> their area <strong>of</strong> expertise, has hampered theDepartment as it deals with a flood <strong>of</strong> work during this building boom.b. Problems in HiringPermit and inspection fees declined swiftly in the most recent recession, reducedoperating revenue and required DBI to dramatically reduce staffing levels to maintain abalanced operating budget. Construction activity in San Francisco rebounded after therecession, and DBI was unable to quickly replace staff who were laid <strong>of</strong>f, due to theCity’s cumbersome hiring procedures and internal Department inefficiency in moving theprocess forward. The DBI had to analyze job content, update job descriptions, anddevelop a test for each job classification before recruiting could begin. These and othercivil service procedures extended the hiring timeline to about one year. When we beganour investigation, there were roughly 75 vacant positions. Although many <strong>of</strong> them havebeen filled, the Department remains understaffed for the current workload.DBI estimates that it will have a $37 million, four-year department operating surplus atthe end <strong>of</strong> the current fiscal year. A study prepared by the Controller recommends thatDBI maintain a $17 million operating reserve to support an orderly staff level transitionwhen the current building boom ends.c. Lack <strong>of</strong> Current Policies and ProceduresThe <strong>Jury</strong> requested and reviewed the Department’s policies and procedures manuals,which are a basic tool <strong>of</strong> any agency and especially important in a regulated, technicalfield. The policies and procedures documents provided to us were frequently outdated,with some from the late 1980s, most from the 1990s, and a few updates through 2007.We understand that these aging manuals were not widely distributed and used. Some areavailable as online resources within DBI, and a few can be found online by the public.d. TrainingAfter a significant number <strong>of</strong> employees were laid <strong>of</strong>f during the economic downturn, theDepartment was short <strong>of</strong> funds and there was some justification to consider training as asecondary need. Current management is trying to emphasize training more than in thepast.Training needs identified but not yet fully implemented include:Building a Better Future at the Department <strong>of</strong> Building Inspection13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!