Ezra Taft Benson and the State of Israel - Brandeis Institutional ...

Ezra Taft Benson and the State of Israel - Brandeis Institutional ... Ezra Taft Benson and the State of Israel - Brandeis Institutional ...

bir.brandeis.edu
from bir.brandeis.edu More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

with Britain and France, for their collusion against Egypt in the 1956 Sinai Campaign,they never questioned Israel's legitimacy as a state. 145Perhaps part of the reason the President was able to keep a low profile regardingIsrael was because, by the early 1950s, Israel to a large extent had already faded from theAmerican public awareness. 146Even in the years directly after World War II, Americansupport for a Jewish state was only slightly greater than its opposition. 147In fact, otherthan Evangelical and Jewish support, the lack of opposition seemed to be the mood in theU.S. more than unwavering support. 148 They agreed, like Truman, that the Jews ofEurope needed somewhere to go, 149 and two-thirds of Americans favored the formationof a Jewish state, 150 but by the early and mid-1950s, other concerns filled the publicagenda. Grose explains that the Korean War, combined with the looming threat ofCommunism in both the Soviet Union and China, “evoked much greater publicpassions.” 151American support for Israel took an immediate downturn in the fall of 1956. Thatwas when Britain, France, and Israel colluded, as was later discovered, to invade Egypt'sSinai in an attempt to reclaim the Suez, end Nasser's defiant support of Algerianindependence, and ease pressure from Egyptian fedayeen attacks on Israel from theunruly Sinai border, among various aims. 152 As noted previously, President Eisenhower145146147148149150151152Oren, Power, Faith and Fantasy, 516.Grose, Israel in the Mind of America, 303.Grose, Israel in the Mind of America, chapter 11.Mart, “Christianization of Israel and Jews,” 119.Oren, Power, Faith and Fantasy, 483; Grose, Israel in the Mind of America, 208.Grose, Israel in the Mind of America, 262.Grose, Israel in the Mind of America, 303.For more explanation of the Sinai Campaign of 1956, see Michael B. Oren, “Secret Egypt-Israel PeaceInitiatives Prior to the Suez Campaign,” Middle Eastern Studies, Vol. 26, no. 3 (July, 1990), 351-370;and S. Ilan Troen, “The Protocol of Sèvres: British/French/Israeli Collusion against Egypt,” Israel48

and Secretary Dulles were furious; in the American public, support for Israel declinedsharply, a decline Israel simply couldn't afford. 153That mood of disdain for Israeli aggression against Egypt was not to last long. AsAmerica struggled to find success against Communist forces in Vietnam and observedwith great concern the increasing Soviet involvement with Egypt and the broader MiddleEast, support for Israel as a strategic island of pro-Western forces began to win out overfrustration with the 1956 debacle. Egypt's ruler Nasser evicted from Sinai and the GazaStrip the UN peacekeeping forces that had remained since the Suez Crisis a decadebefore, and made his intention clear to, as the Iraqi leader had put it, “wipe Israel off theface of the map.” 154 Joining forces with Jordan and Syria, Egypt made preparations forwar with Israel, confident of support from the Soviet Union. Meanwhile, Israelileadership, remembering American anger over 1956, remained unsure whether topreemptively strike or await attack. 155 They chose to attack first, but this time, Americalooked much more favorably on the Israeli victory against its Arab neighbors, manyseeing it as a proxy fight in their own Cold War with the Soviets. 156 According to Oren,American support for Israel in 1967 had two major bases: the opinion of manyevangelicals that Israel's victory in the Six-Day War was evidence of divine intervention,and thus that the messianic age was nigh at hand; and politically, the understanding of153154155156Studies, Vol. 1, no. 2 (Fall, 1996), 122-139.Grose, Israel in the Mind of America, 304.Oren, Power, Faith and Fantasy, 525.Oren, Power, Faith and Fantasy, 525.Oren, Power, Faith and Fantasy, 527.49

<strong>and</strong> Secretary Dulles were furious; in <strong>the</strong> American public, support for <strong>Israel</strong> declinedsharply, a decline <strong>Israel</strong> simply couldn't afford. 153That mood <strong>of</strong> disdain for <strong>Israel</strong>i aggression against Egypt was not to last long. AsAmerica struggled to find success against Communist forces in Vietnam <strong>and</strong> observedwith great concern <strong>the</strong> increasing Soviet involvement with Egypt <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> broader MiddleEast, support for <strong>Israel</strong> as a strategic isl<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> pro-Western forces began to win out overfrustration with <strong>the</strong> 1956 debacle. Egypt's ruler Nasser evicted from Sinai <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> GazaStrip <strong>the</strong> UN peacekeeping forces that had remained since <strong>the</strong> Suez Crisis a decadebefore, <strong>and</strong> made his intention clear to, as <strong>the</strong> Iraqi leader had put it, “wipe <strong>Israel</strong> <strong>of</strong>f <strong>the</strong>face <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> map.” 154 Joining forces with Jordan <strong>and</strong> Syria, Egypt made preparations forwar with <strong>Israel</strong>, confident <strong>of</strong> support from <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union. Meanwhile, <strong>Israel</strong>ileadership, remembering American anger over 1956, remained unsure whe<strong>the</strong>r topreemptively strike or await attack. 155 They chose to attack first, but this time, Americalooked much more favorably on <strong>the</strong> <strong>Israel</strong>i victory against its Arab neighbors, manyseeing it as a proxy fight in <strong>the</strong>ir own Cold War with <strong>the</strong> Soviets. 156 According to Oren,American support for <strong>Israel</strong> in 1967 had two major bases: <strong>the</strong> opinion <strong>of</strong> manyevangelicals that <strong>Israel</strong>'s victory in <strong>the</strong> Six-Day War was evidence <strong>of</strong> divine intervention,<strong>and</strong> thus that <strong>the</strong> messianic age was nigh at h<strong>and</strong>; <strong>and</strong> politically, <strong>the</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong>153154155156Studies, Vol. 1, no. 2 (Fall, 1996), 122-139.Grose, <strong>Israel</strong> in <strong>the</strong> Mind <strong>of</strong> America, 304.Oren, Power, Faith <strong>and</strong> Fantasy, 525.Oren, Power, Faith <strong>and</strong> Fantasy, 525.Oren, Power, Faith <strong>and</strong> Fantasy, 527.49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!