12.07.2015 Views

Ezra Taft Benson and the State of Israel - Brandeis Institutional ...

Ezra Taft Benson and the State of Israel - Brandeis Institutional ...

Ezra Taft Benson and the State of Israel - Brandeis Institutional ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

U.S. agricultural products on credit. Thus, in his capacity as Secretary <strong>of</strong> Agriculture,<strong>Benson</strong> made a number <strong>of</strong> trips to countries around <strong>the</strong> world, two <strong>of</strong> which carried himto <strong>Israel</strong>.Again, as noted in Chapter Two, my analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>Benson</strong>'s political experience islimited because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> access to <strong>Benson</strong>'s personal record. Yet <strong>the</strong> public record isquite compelling <strong>and</strong> is <strong>the</strong> basis for my examination here. The documentation in thischapter is more diverse than for <strong>the</strong> previous chapter detailing his religious perspectives,<strong>and</strong> includes some <strong>of</strong> his own thoughts <strong>and</strong> public comments, illustrated mostly innewspapers <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r articles, as well as some personal correspondence. In order toachieve a more thorough underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> <strong>Benson</strong>'s views, I begin with a study <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>political views <strong>of</strong> contemporary U.S. leaders, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>n contrast <strong>the</strong>m with those <strong>of</strong><strong>Benson</strong>. The record reveals that, while <strong>Benson</strong> faithfully represented his country'sinterests during his visits <strong>and</strong> in his public commentary, he also exhibited a strongpartiality for <strong>the</strong> Jewish <strong>State</strong>, especially regarding its disputed place in <strong>the</strong> Middle East.America's relationship with <strong>Israel</strong> remained ambivalent throughout <strong>the</strong> 1950s, <strong>and</strong>in <strong>the</strong> years leading up to <strong>Israel</strong>'s establishment in 1948, American support <strong>of</strong> a Jewishstate was anything but certain. After World War I, America clung to an internationaldiplomatic policy <strong>of</strong> neutrality, especially where <strong>the</strong> Middle East was concerned.Pr<strong>of</strong>essional diplomats <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1920s particularly opposed Zionism, a dislike that MichaelOren attributes to Christian missionary efforts in <strong>the</strong> Middle East <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir concern overZionist disruption <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir labors. 113President Franklin D. Roosevelt proclaimed anassurance <strong>of</strong> American neutrality, but, like much <strong>of</strong> his country, seemed ambivalent about113Oren, Power, Faith <strong>and</strong> Fantasy, 423.42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!