12.07.2015 Views

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

84 One-Dimensional <strong>Systems</strong>steady-state current (pA)200-20-40-60I (V)(V sn , I sn )I sn -k(V-V sn )2I-V relation-60 -40 -20membrane potential, V (mV)Figure 3.34: Magnification of the I-V curve <strong>in</strong> Fig. 3.31 at the left knee shows that itcan be approximated by a square parabola.Consider<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite values of the membrane potential may be convenient from apurely mathematical po<strong>in</strong>t of view, but this has no physical mean<strong>in</strong>g and no way tosimulate it on a digital computer. Instead, we fix a sufficiently large constant V peakand say that (3.9) generated a spike when V (t) reached V peak . After the peak of thespike is reached, we reset V (t) to a new value V reset . The topological normal form forthe saddle-node bifurcation with the after-spike resett<strong>in</strong>g˙V = I + V 2 , if V ≥ V peak , then V ← V reset (3.10)is called the quadratic <strong>in</strong>tegrate-and-fire neuron. It is the simplest model of a spik<strong>in</strong>gneuron. The name stems from its resemblance to the leaky <strong>in</strong>tegrate-and-fire neuron˙V = I −V considered <strong>in</strong> Chap. 8. In contrast to the common folklore, the leaky neuronis not a spik<strong>in</strong>g model because it does not have a spike-generation mechanism, i.e., aregenerative up-stroke of the membrane potential, whereas the quadratic neuron does.We discuss this and other issues <strong>in</strong> detail <strong>in</strong> Chap. 8.In general, quadratic <strong>in</strong>tegrate-and-fire model could be derived directly from theequation C ˙V = I − I ∞ (V ) by approximat<strong>in</strong>g the steady-state I-V curve near therest<strong>in</strong>g state by the square parabola I ∞ (V ) ≈ I sn − k(V − V sn ) 2 , where k > 0 andthe peak of the curve (V sn , I sn ) could be easily found experimentally; see Fig. 3.34.Approximat<strong>in</strong>g the I-V curve by other functions, for example I ∞ (V ) = g leak (V −V rest )−ke pV , results <strong>in</strong> other forms of the model, e.g., the exponential <strong>in</strong>tegrate-and-fire model(Fourcaud-Trocme et al. 2003), which has certa<strong>in</strong> advantages over the quadratic form.Unfortunately, the model is not solvable analytically, and it is expensive to simulate.The form I ∞ (V ) = g leak (V −V leak )−k(V −V th ) 2 +, where x + = x when x > 0 and x + = 0otherwise, comb<strong>in</strong>es the advantages of both models. The parameters V peak and V resetare derived from the shape of the spike. Normalization of variables and parametersresults <strong>in</strong> the form (3.10) with V peak = 1.In Fig. 3.35 we simulated the quadratic <strong>in</strong>tegrate-and-fire neuron to illustrate a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!