12.07.2015 Views

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Electrophysiology of Neurons 51Bibliographical NotesOur summary of the membrane electrophysiology is limited: We present only those conceptsthat are necessary to understand the Hodgk<strong>in</strong>-Huxley description of generation ofaction potentials. We have omitted such important topics as Goldman-Hodgk<strong>in</strong>-Katzequation, cable theory, dendritic and synaptic function, etc., although some of thosewill be <strong>in</strong>troduced later <strong>in</strong> the book.The standard textbook on membrane electrophysiology is the second edition ofIon Channels of Excitable Membranes by B. Hille (2001). An excellent <strong>in</strong>troductorytextbook with an emphasis on the quantitative approach is Foundations of CellularNeurophysiology by D. Johnston and S. Wu (1995). A detailed <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>in</strong>to mathematicalaspects of cellular biophysics can be found <strong>in</strong> Mathematical Physiology byJ. Keener and J. Sneyd (1998). The latter two books complement rather than repeateach other. Biophysics of Computation by Koch (1999) and Chapters 5 and 6 of Theoretical<strong>Neuroscience</strong> by Dayan and Abbott (2001) provide a good <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>in</strong>tobiophysics of excitable membranes.The first book devoted exclusively to dendrites is Dendrites by Stuart et al. (1999).It emphasizes the active nature of dendritic dynamics. Arshavsky et al. (1971; Russianlanguage edition - 1969) make the first and probably still the best theoretical attempt tounderstand the neuro-computational properties of branch<strong>in</strong>g dendritic trees endowedwith voltage-gated channels and capable of generat<strong>in</strong>g action potentials. Had theypublished their results <strong>in</strong> the 90s, they would have been considered classics <strong>in</strong> the field;Unfortunately, the computational neuroscience community of the 70s was not ready toaccept the “heretic” idea that dendrites can fire spikes, that spikes can propagate backand forward along the dendritic tree, that EPSPs can be scaled-up with distance, that<strong>in</strong>dividual dendritic branches can perform co<strong>in</strong>cidence detection and branch<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>tscan perform non-l<strong>in</strong>ear summation, and that different and <strong>in</strong>dependent computationscan be carried out at different parts of the neuronal dendritic tree. We touch some ofthese issues <strong>in</strong> Chap. 8.Exercises1. Determ<strong>in</strong>e Nernst equilibrium potentials for the membrane of the squid giantaxon us<strong>in</strong>g the follow<strong>in</strong>g dataand T = 20 ◦ C.Inside (mM) Outside (mM)K + 430 20Na + 50 440Cl − 65 5602. Show that a non-selective cation currentI = ḡ Na p (V − E Na ) + ḡ K p (V − E K )

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!