12.07.2015 Views

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

506 Synchronization (see www.izhikevich.com)Katriel (2005) obta<strong>in</strong>ed many <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g results on <strong>in</strong>-phase synchronization of identicalphase oscillators.Interactions between resonant oscillators were considered by Ermentrout (1981),Hoppensteadt and Izhikevich (1997) and Izhikevich (1999) <strong>in</strong> the context of quasiperiodic(multi-frequency) oscillations. Baesens et al. (1991) undertook heroic taskof study<strong>in</strong>g resonances and toroidal chaos <strong>in</strong> a system of three coupled phase oscillators.Mean-field approaches to the Kuramoto model are reviewed by Strogatz (2000)and Acebron et al. (2005). Daido (1996) extended the theory to the general coupl<strong>in</strong>gfunction H(χ). van Hemmen and Wresz<strong>in</strong>ski (1993) were the first to f<strong>in</strong>d the Lyapunovfunction for the Kuramoto model, which was generalized (<strong>in</strong>dependently) byHoppensteadt and Izhikevich (1997) to arbitrary coupl<strong>in</strong>g function H(χ).Ermentrout (1985), Aronson et al. (1990) and Hoppensteadt and Izhikevich (1996,1997) studied weakly coupled Andronov-Hopf oscillators, and discussed the phenomenaof self-ignition (coupl<strong>in</strong>g-<strong>in</strong>duced oscillations) and oscillator death (coupl<strong>in</strong>g-<strong>in</strong>ducedcessation of oscillation). Coll<strong>in</strong>s and Stewart (1993, 1994) and Golubitsky and Stewart(2002) applied group theory to study synchronization of coupled oscillators <strong>in</strong> networkswith symmetries.In this chapter we consider either strong pulsed coupl<strong>in</strong>g or weak cont<strong>in</strong>uous coupl<strong>in</strong>g.These limitations are severe, but they allow us to derive model-<strong>in</strong>dependentresults. Study<strong>in</strong>g synchronization <strong>in</strong> networks of strongly coupled neurons is an activearea of research, however, most of such studies fall <strong>in</strong>to two categories: (1) simulationsand (2) <strong>in</strong>tegrate-and-fire networks. In both cases, the results are model-depended. Ifthe reader wants to pursue this l<strong>in</strong>e of research, he or she will def<strong>in</strong>itely need to readthe follow<strong>in</strong>g papers: Mirollo and Strogatz (1990), van Vreeswijk et al. (1994), Chowand Kopell (2000), Rub<strong>in</strong> and Terman (2000, 2002), Bressloff and Coombes (2000),van Vreeswijk (2000), van Vreeswijk and Hansel (2001), Pfeuty et al. (2003), Hanseland Mato (2003).Exercises1. F<strong>in</strong>d the isochrons of the Andronov-Hopf oscillatorż = (1 + i)z − z|z| 2 , z ∈ C ,<strong>in</strong> Fig. 10.3.2. Prove that the isochrons of the Andronov-Hopf oscillator <strong>in</strong> the formż = (1 + i)z + (−1 + di)z|z| 2 , z ∈ C ,are the curvesz(s) = s (−1+di) e χi , s > 0 ,where χ is the phase of the isochron; see Fig. 10.45.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!