12.07.2015 Views

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

500 Synchronization (see www.izhikevich.com)the jump. Let τ 1 (d) be the time needed to slide from po<strong>in</strong>t b ′ to po<strong>in</strong>t d ′ , i.e., thephase difference after the jump. The phase difference between the oscillators dur<strong>in</strong>gthe jump changes by the factor C(d) = τ 1 (d)/τ 0 (d) called the compression function.The difference decreases when the compression function C(d) < 1 uniformly for all dnear the left knee a. This condition has a simple geometrical mean<strong>in</strong>g: The rate ofchange of y(t) is slower before the jump than after it, so that y(t) has a “scalloped”shape, as <strong>in</strong> Fig. 10.40c. As an exercise, prove that C(d) → |g(a)|/|g(b ′ )| as d → a.If the compression function at the right (upper) knee is also less than 1, then the<strong>in</strong>-phase synchronization is stable. Indeed, the phase difference does not change whilethe oscillators slide along the nullcl<strong>in</strong>es, and it decreases geometrically with each jump.In fact, it suffices to require that the product of compression factors at the two kneesbe less than 1, so that any expansion at one knee is compensated by even strongercompression at the other knee.10.4.5 Burst<strong>in</strong>g oscillatorsLet us consider burst<strong>in</strong>g neurons coupled weakly through their fast variables:ẋ i = f(x i , y i ) + εp(x i , x j ) , (10.27)ẏ i = µg(x i , y i ) , (10.28)i = 1, 2 and j = 2, 1. S<strong>in</strong>ce burst<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>volves two time scales, fast spik<strong>in</strong>g and slowtransition between spik<strong>in</strong>g and rest<strong>in</strong>g, there are two synchronization regimes: spikesynchronization and burst synchronization, illustrated <strong>in</strong> Fig. 9.51 and discussed <strong>in</strong>Sect. 9.4. Below we outl<strong>in</strong>e some useful ideas and methods of study<strong>in</strong>g both regimes.Our exposition is not complete, but it rather lays the foundation for a more detailedresearch program.Spike synchronizationTo study synchronization of <strong>in</strong>dividual spikes with<strong>in</strong> the burst, we let µ = 0 to freezethe slow subsystem (10.28) and consider the fast subsystem (10.27) describ<strong>in</strong>g weaklycoupled oscillators. When y i ≈ y j , the fast variables oscillate with approximately equalperiods, so (10.27) can be reduced to the phase model˙ϕ i = εH(ϕ j − ϕ i , y i ) ,where y i = const parameterize the form of the connection function. For example,dur<strong>in</strong>g the ”circle/Hopf” burst, the function is transformed from H(χ) = s<strong>in</strong> 2 χ or1 − cos χ at the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of the burst (saddle-node on <strong>in</strong>variant circle bifurcation)to H(χ) = s<strong>in</strong> χ at the end of the burst (supercritical Andronov-Hopf bifurcation).Chang<strong>in</strong>g y i slowly, one can study when spike synchronization appears and when itdisappears dur<strong>in</strong>g the burst. When the slow variables y i have different values, fastvariables typically oscillate with different frequencies, so one needs to look at low-orderresonances (see next section) to study the possibility of spike synchronization.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!