12.07.2015 Views

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Synchronization (see www.izhikevich.com) 499(a)p(x)=1(c)y 1 (t)y 2 (t)p(x)=0(b)(d)f(x,f(x,f(x,y)=0y)+=0f(x,y)=0y)+=0dd'ab'ab'Figure 10.40: Fast threshold modulation of relaxation oscillation. (a) The Heavisideor sigmoidal coupl<strong>in</strong>g function p(x) is constant while x is on the left or right branch ofthe x-nullcl<strong>in</strong>e. (b) In the relaxation limit µ = 0, the synchronized limit cycle consistsof the left branch of the nullcl<strong>in</strong>e f(x, y) = 0 and the right branch of the nullcl<strong>in</strong>ef(x, y) + ε = 0. When oscillator 1 is ahead of oscillator 2 (c), the phase differencebetween them decreases after the jump (d).Kopell (1993, 1995) referred to such a coupl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the relaxation limit µ → 0 as fastthreshold modulation (FTM), and found a simple criterion of stability of synchronizedstate that works even for strong coupl<strong>in</strong>g.S<strong>in</strong>ce the oscillators are identical, the <strong>in</strong>-phase synchronized state exists, dur<strong>in</strong>gwhich the variables x 1 and x 2 follow the left branch of the x-nullcl<strong>in</strong>e def<strong>in</strong>ed byf(x, y) = 0, see Fig. 10.40b, until they reach the jump<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t a. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>stantaneousjump, they turn on the mutual coupl<strong>in</strong>g ε, and land at some po<strong>in</strong>t b ′ onthe perturbed x-nullcl<strong>in</strong>e def<strong>in</strong>ed by f(x, y) + ε = 0. They follow the new nullcl<strong>in</strong>euntil the right (upper) knee, and then jump back to the left branch.To determ<strong>in</strong>e the stability of the <strong>in</strong>-phase synchronization, we consider the casewhen oscillator 1 is slightly ahead of oscillator 2, as <strong>in</strong> Fig. 10.40c. We assume thatthe phase difference between the oscillators is so small, or alternatively, the strengthof coupl<strong>in</strong>g is so large, that when oscillator 1 jumps and turns on its <strong>in</strong>put to oscillator2, the latter, be<strong>in</strong>g at po<strong>in</strong>t d <strong>in</strong> Fig. 10.40d, is below the left knee of the perturbedx-nullcl<strong>in</strong>e f(x, y) + ε = 0 and therefore jumps too. As a result, both oscillators jumpto the perturbed x-nullcl<strong>in</strong>e and reverse their order. Although the apparent distancebetween the oscillators, measured by the difference of their y-coord<strong>in</strong>ates, is preserveddur<strong>in</strong>g such a jump, the phase difference between them is usually not.The phase difference between two po<strong>in</strong>ts on a limit cycle is the time needed totravel from one po<strong>in</strong>t to the other. Let τ 0 (d) be the time needed to slide from po<strong>in</strong>td to po<strong>in</strong>t a along the x-nullcl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> Fig. 10.40d, i.e., the phase difference just before

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!