12.07.2015 Views

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

492 Synchronization (see www.izhikevich.com)depicted <strong>in</strong> Fig. 10.35, where A is the magnitude of the pulse. Notice that PRC tiltsto the left as A <strong>in</strong>creases. Indeed, the density of isochrons, denoted by black po<strong>in</strong>ts onthe x-axis <strong>in</strong> the figure, is maximal at the ghost of the saddle-node po<strong>in</strong>t x = 0 wherethe parabola 1 + x 2 has the knee. This corresponds to the <strong>in</strong>flection po<strong>in</strong>t of the graphof x(t) <strong>in</strong> Fig. 10.34 where the dynamics of x(t) is the slowest. The effect of a pulseis maximal just before the ghost because x can jump over the ghost and skip the slowregion. The stronger the pulse, the earlier it should arrive, hence the tilt.Weak coupl<strong>in</strong>gThe PRC behaves as A s<strong>in</strong> 2 ϑ, with ϑ ∈ [0, π], when A is small, as the reader can see<strong>in</strong> Fig. 10.35 or prove himself by differentiat<strong>in</strong>g the function PRC (ϑ, A) with respectto A. Therefore, Z(ϑ) = s<strong>in</strong> 2 ϑ, and we can use W<strong>in</strong>free’a approach to transform theweakly perturbed quadratic <strong>in</strong>tegrate-and-fire (QIF) oscillator<strong>in</strong>to its phase modelx ′ = 1 + x 2 + εp(t)x ′ = 1 + ε(s<strong>in</strong> 2 ϑ)p(t) , ϑ ∈ [0, π] .The results of the previous section, Q(ϑ) = 1/f(x(ϑ)) = 1/(1+cot 2 ϑ) = s<strong>in</strong> 2 ϑ, confirmthe phase model. In fact, any neuronal model C ˙V = I − I ∞ (V ) near saddle-node on<strong>in</strong>variant circle bifurcation po<strong>in</strong>t (I sn , V sn ) has <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>itesimal PRCPRC (ϑ) =CI − I sns<strong>in</strong> 2 ϑ , ϑ ∈ [0, π] ,as the reader can prove as an exercise. The function s<strong>in</strong> 2 ϑ co<strong>in</strong>cides with the familiar1 − cos θ when θ = 2ϑ has period 2π (notice the font difference).In Fig. 10.36a we compare the function with numerically obta<strong>in</strong>ed PRCs for theI Na + I K -model <strong>in</strong> Class 1 regime. S<strong>in</strong>ce the ghost of the saddle-node po<strong>in</strong>t, reveal<strong>in</strong>gitself as an <strong>in</strong>flection of the voltage trace <strong>in</strong> Fig. 10.36b, moves to the right as I <strong>in</strong>creasesaway from the bifurcation value I = 4.51, so does the peak of the PRC.Figure 10.36a emphasizes the common features of all systems undergo<strong>in</strong>g saddlenodeon <strong>in</strong>variant circle bifurcation: They are <strong>in</strong>sensitive to the <strong>in</strong>puts arriv<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>gthe spike, s<strong>in</strong>ce PRC ≈ 0 when ϑ ≈ 0, T . The oscillators are most sensitive to the <strong>in</strong>putwhen they are just enter<strong>in</strong>g the ghost of the rest<strong>in</strong>g state, where PRC is maximal.The location of the maximum tilts to the left as the strength of the <strong>in</strong>put <strong>in</strong>creases,and may tilt to the right as the distance to the bifurcation <strong>in</strong>creases. F<strong>in</strong>ally, PRCsare non-negative, so positive (negative) <strong>in</strong>puts can only advance (delay) the phase ofoscillation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!