12.07.2015 Views

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

484 Synchronization (see www.izhikevich.com)(a)max G0(b)max G0G( )m<strong>in</strong> GG( )0 1 2 3phase difference,T0 1 2 3phase difference,TFigure 10.30: Geometrical <strong>in</strong>terpretation of equilibria of the phase model (10.17) forgap-junction-coupled Class 2 I Na + I K -oscillators (see Fig. 10.26).whereω = ω 2 − ω 1 and G(χ) = H 2 (−χ) − H 1 (χ) ,is the frequency mismatch and the anti-symmetric part of the coupl<strong>in</strong>g, respectively,illustrated <strong>in</strong> Fig. 10.26, dashed curves. A stable equilibrium of (10.17) corresponds toa stable limit cycle of the phase model.All equilibria of (10.17) are solutions to G(χ) = −ω, and they are <strong>in</strong>tersections ofthe horizontal l<strong>in</strong>e −ω with the graph of G, as illustrated <strong>in</strong> Fig. 10.30a. They arestable if the slope of the graph is negative at the <strong>in</strong>tersection. If the oscillators areidentical, then G(χ) = H(−χ) − H(χ) is an odd function (i.e., G(−χ) = −G(χ)),and χ = 0 and χ = T/2 are always equilibria, possibly unstable, correspond<strong>in</strong>g to the<strong>in</strong>-phase and anti-phase synchronized solutions. The stability condition of the <strong>in</strong>-phasesynchronized state isG ′ (0) = −2H ′ (0) < 0(stability of <strong>in</strong>-phase synchronization)The <strong>in</strong>-phase synchronization of electrically (gap-junction) coupled oscillators <strong>in</strong> Fig. 10.26is stable because the slope of G (dashed curves) is negative at χ = 0. Simulation of twocoupled I Na + I K -oscillators <strong>in</strong> Fig. 10.25 confirms that. Coupled oscillators <strong>in</strong> Class 2regime also have a stable anti-phase solution, s<strong>in</strong>ce G ′ < 0 at χ = T/2 <strong>in</strong> Fig. 10.30a.The max and m<strong>in</strong> values of the function G determ<strong>in</strong>e the tolerance of the networkto the frequency mismatch ω, s<strong>in</strong>ce there are no equilibria outside this range. Geometrically,as ω <strong>in</strong>creases (the second oscillator speeds up), the horizontal l<strong>in</strong>e −ω <strong>in</strong>Fig. 10.30a slides down, and the phase difference χ = ϕ 2 − ϕ 1 <strong>in</strong>creases, compensat<strong>in</strong>gfor the frequency mismatch ω. When ω > − m<strong>in</strong> G, the second oscillator becomestoo fast, and the synchronized state is lost via saddle-node on <strong>in</strong>variant circle bifurcation;see Fig. 10.30b. This bifurcation corresponds to the annihilation of stable andunstable limit cycles of the weakly coupled network, and the result<strong>in</strong>g activity is calleddrift<strong>in</strong>g, cycle slipp<strong>in</strong>g, or phase walk-through. The variable χ slowly passes the ghostof the saddle-node po<strong>in</strong>t, where G(χ) ≈ 0, then <strong>in</strong>creases past T , appears at 0, andapproaches the ghost aga<strong>in</strong>, thereby slipp<strong>in</strong>g a cycle and walk<strong>in</strong>g through all the phasevalues [0, T ]. The frequency of such slipp<strong>in</strong>g scales as √ ω + m<strong>in</strong> G; see Sect. 6.1.2.In Fig. 10.31 we contrast synchronization properties of weakly coupled oscillatorsof relaxation and non-relaxation type. The function G(χ) of the former has a negative

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!