12.07.2015 Views

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

482 Synchronization (see www.izhikevich.com)frequency lock<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>-phaseentra<strong>in</strong>ment(1:1 frequency lock<strong>in</strong>g)synchronizationphase lock<strong>in</strong>ganti-phaseFigure 10.28: Various degrees of lock<strong>in</strong>g of oscillators.The coupled oscillators above are said to be frequency locked when there is a periodictrajectory on the 2-torus, which is called a torus knot. It is said to be of type (p, q)if ϑ 1 makes p rotations while ϑ 2 makes q rotations, and p and q are relatively prime<strong>in</strong>tegers, i.e., do not have a common divisor greater than 1. Torus knots of type (p, q)produce p:q frequency lock<strong>in</strong>g, e.g., 2:3 frequency lock<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Fig. 10.27. A 1:1 frequencylock<strong>in</strong>g is called entra<strong>in</strong>ment. There could be many periodic orbits on the torus, withstable orbits between unstable ones. S<strong>in</strong>ce the orbits on the 2-torus cannot <strong>in</strong>tersect,they all are knots of the same type, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the same p:q frequency lock<strong>in</strong>g.Let us follow a trajectory on the torus and count the number of rotations of thephase variables. The limit of the ratio of rotations as t → ∞ is <strong>in</strong>dependent on thetrajectory we follow, and it is called the rotation number of the torus flow. It is rationalif and only if there is a (p, q) periodic orbit, <strong>in</strong> which case the rotation number is p/q.An irrational rotation number implies there are no periodic orbits, and it corresponds toa quasi-periodic or multifrequency torus flow. Oscillators exhibit phase drift<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> thiscase. Denjoy (1932) proved that such coupled oscillators are topologically equivalentto the uncoupled system ˙ϑ 1 = r, ˙ϑ2 = 1 with irrational r.Suppose the oscillators are frequency locked; that is, there is a p : q limit cycleattractor on the torus. We say that the oscillators are p : q phase locked ifqϑ 1 (t) − pϑ 2 (t) = conston the cycle. The value of the constant determ<strong>in</strong>es whether the lock<strong>in</strong>g is <strong>in</strong>-phase(const= 0), anti-phase (const= T/2, half-period), or out-of-phase. Frequency lock<strong>in</strong>gdoes not necessarily imply phase lock<strong>in</strong>g: The (2, 3) torus knot <strong>in</strong> Fig. 10.27b correspondsto phase lock<strong>in</strong>g, whereas that <strong>in</strong> Fig. 10.27c does not. Frequency lock<strong>in</strong>gwithout phase lock<strong>in</strong>g is called phase trapp<strong>in</strong>g. F<strong>in</strong>ally, synchronization is a 1:1 phaselock<strong>in</strong>g. The phase difference ϑ 2 − ϑ 1 is also called phase lag or phase lead. Therelationships between all these def<strong>in</strong>itions are shown <strong>in</strong> Fig. 10.28.Frequency lock<strong>in</strong>g, phase lock<strong>in</strong>g, entra<strong>in</strong>ment, and synchronization of a networkof n > 2 oscillators is the same as pair-wise lock<strong>in</strong>g, entra<strong>in</strong>ment, and synchronization

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!