12.07.2015 Views

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

476 Synchronization (see www.izhikevich.com)Figure 10.22: Ioel Gil’evich Malk<strong>in</strong> (IoзlьGilьeviq Malk<strong>in</strong>, 1907-1958).where the T -periodic function Q is the solution to the l<strong>in</strong>ear “adjo<strong>in</strong>t” equation˙Q = −{Df(x(t))} ⊤ Q , with Q(0) · f(x(0)) = 1 , (10.10)where Df(x(t)) ⊤ is the transposed Jacobian of f (matrix of partial derivatives) atthe po<strong>in</strong>t x(t) on the limit cycle, and the normalization condition can be replaced byQ(t) · f(x(t)) = 1 for any and hence all t (prove it). Here Q · f is the dot product oftwo vectors, which is the same as Q ⊤ f.Though this theorem looks less <strong>in</strong>tuitive than the methods of W<strong>in</strong>free and Kuramoto,it is actually more useful because (10.10) can be solved numerically quiteeasily. Apply<strong>in</strong>g the MATLAB procedure <strong>in</strong> Ex. 12 to the four oscillators <strong>in</strong> Fig. 10.3,we plot their functions Q <strong>in</strong> Fig. 10.23. It is not a co<strong>in</strong>cidence that each componentof Q looks like PRC along the first or the second state variable, respectively, shown <strong>in</strong>Fig. 10.6. Subtract<strong>in</strong>g (10.9) from (10.8) or from (10.6), we conclude thatZ(ϑ) = grad ϑ(x) = Q(ϑ) ,(see also Ex. 7), so that we can determ<strong>in</strong>e the l<strong>in</strong>ear response function of the phasemodel us<strong>in</strong>g any of the three alternative methods: via PRCs, via isochrons, or solv<strong>in</strong>gthe adjo<strong>in</strong>t equation (10.10). This justifies why many refer to the function as just PRC,implicitly assum<strong>in</strong>g that it is measured to the <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>itesimal stimuli and then normalizedby the stimulus amplitude.10.2.4 Measur<strong>in</strong>g PRCs experimentallyIn Fig. 10.24 we exploit the relationship (10.9) and measure the <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>itesimal PRCsof a layer 5 pyramidal neuron of mouse visual cortex. First, we stimulate the neuronwith 40 pA dc-current to elicit periodic spik<strong>in</strong>g. Initially, the fir<strong>in</strong>g period starts at50 ms, and then relaxes to the averaged value of 110 ms (Fig. 10.24a). The standardmethod of f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g PRCs consists <strong>in</strong> stimulat<strong>in</strong>g the neuron by brief pulses of currentat different phases of the cycle and measur<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>duced phase shift, which couldbe approximated by the difference between two successive periods of oscillation. Themethod works f<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> models, see Ex. 5, but should be used with caution <strong>in</strong> real neuronsbecause their fir<strong>in</strong>g is too noisy, as we demonstrate <strong>in</strong> Fig. 10.24b. Thus, one needs

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!