12.07.2015 Views

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Burst<strong>in</strong>g 3951K + activation gate, n0.80.60.40.20-80 -60 -40 -20 0membrane potential, V (mV)Figure 9.55: Burst<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> two-dimensional I Na,p +I K -model with parameters as <strong>in</strong>Fig. 6.16 and I = 43.<strong>in</strong> the po<strong>in</strong>t-po<strong>in</strong>t hysteresis loops <strong>in</strong> Ex. 19. This assumption is violated when the neuronfires a burst of spikes. Thus, the theory is helpless <strong>in</strong> study<strong>in</strong>g fast-slow po<strong>in</strong>t-cyclebursters. An exception is Pontryag<strong>in</strong>’s problem, which is related to “fold cycle/foldcycle” burst<strong>in</strong>g; see Ex. 21 below and Sect. 7 <strong>in</strong> Mishchenko et al. (1994). Pontryag<strong>in</strong>and Rodyg<strong>in</strong> (1960) pioneered the method of averag<strong>in</strong>g of the fast subsystem, whichwas used <strong>in</strong> the context of bursters by R<strong>in</strong>zel and Lee (1986), Pernarowski et al. (1992),Smolen et al. (1993), Baer et al. (1995). Shilnikov et al. (2005) <strong>in</strong>troduced an averagenullcl<strong>in</strong>e of the slow subsystem, and showed how the averag<strong>in</strong>g method can be used tostudy co-existence of spik<strong>in</strong>g and burst<strong>in</strong>g states <strong>in</strong> a model neuron, and bifurcations<strong>in</strong> bursters <strong>in</strong> general. Some of the transitions “rest<strong>in</strong>g ↔ burst<strong>in</strong>g ↔ tonic spik<strong>in</strong>g”were also considered by Ermentrout and Kopell (1986a), Terman (1991), Destexhe andGaspard (1993), Shilnikov and Cymbalyuk (2004, 2005), and Medvedev (2005).The averag<strong>in</strong>g method, as many other classical methods of analysis of dynamicalsystems, breaks down when the fast subsystem slowly passes a bifurcation po<strong>in</strong>t. Thedevelopment of early dynamical system theory was largely motivated by studies ofperiodic oscillators. It is reasonable to expect that the next major developments ofthis theory will be com<strong>in</strong>g from studies of bursters.Exercises1. (Planar burster) Invent a planar system of ODEs hav<strong>in</strong>g a hedgehog limit cycleattractor, as <strong>in</strong> Fig. 9.54, and capable of exhibit<strong>in</strong>g periodic burst<strong>in</strong>g activity.2. (Noise-<strong>in</strong>duced burst<strong>in</strong>g) Expla<strong>in</strong> why the I Na,p +I K -model with the phase portraitas <strong>in</strong> Fig. 9.55 bursts even though it has only two dimensions.3. (Noise-<strong>in</strong>duced burst<strong>in</strong>g) Explore numerically the I Na,p +I K -model with phaseportrait as <strong>in</strong> Fig. 6.7, top, and make it burst as <strong>in</strong> Fig. 9.56 without add<strong>in</strong>gany new current or gat<strong>in</strong>g variable.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!