12.07.2015 Views

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

est<strong>in</strong>g390 Burst<strong>in</strong>gspikesynchronizationspikede-synchronizationspik<strong>in</strong>gABexcitatory coupl<strong>in</strong>gburster B<strong>in</strong>hibitorystimulationexcitatorystimulationAB<strong>in</strong>hibitory coupl<strong>in</strong>gFigure 9.52: Burst synchronization and de-synchronization of two coupled“fold/homocl<strong>in</strong>ic” bursters (modified from Izhikevich 2000).the <strong>in</strong>stantaneous <strong>in</strong>terspike frequency, which may vary substantially dur<strong>in</strong>g a burst.Indeed, a small perturbation of the slow variable may result <strong>in</strong> large perturbations ofthe <strong>in</strong>terspike frequency <strong>in</strong> any shaded burster <strong>in</strong> Fig. 9.50, hence such a burster wouldbe reluctant to exhibit spike synchronization, unless the coupl<strong>in</strong>g is strong.Study<strong>in</strong>g burst synchronization of weakly coupled neurons <strong>in</strong>volves the same mathematicalmethods as study<strong>in</strong>g synchronization of strongly coupled relaxation oscillators,which we consider <strong>in</strong> detail <strong>in</strong> Chap. 10. The mechanisms of synchronization dependon whether the burst<strong>in</strong>g is of the hysteresis loop type or of the slow wave type, andwhether the rest<strong>in</strong>g state is an <strong>in</strong>tegrator or a resonator.In Fig. 9.52 we illustrate the geometry of burst synchronization of two coupled“fold/homocl<strong>in</strong>ic” bursters of hysteresis loop type. Burster A is slightly ahead ofburster B so that A starts the spik<strong>in</strong>g phase while B is still rest<strong>in</strong>g. If the synapticconnections between the bursters are excitatory, fir<strong>in</strong>g of A causes B to jump to thespik<strong>in</strong>g state prematurely, thereby shorten<strong>in</strong>g the time difference between the bursts.In addition, the evoked burst of B is shorter, which also speeds up the synchronizationprocess. In contrast, when the connections are <strong>in</strong>hibitory, fir<strong>in</strong>g of A delays thetransition of B to the spik<strong>in</strong>g state, thereby <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the time difference betweenthe bursts and desynchroniz<strong>in</strong>g the bursters. Thus, the “fold/homocl<strong>in</strong>ic” burster behavesaccord<strong>in</strong>g to the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple excitation means synchronization, <strong>in</strong>hibition meansde-synchronization. S<strong>in</strong>ce the <strong>in</strong>stantaneous <strong>in</strong>terspike frequency of “fold/homocl<strong>in</strong>ic”burst<strong>in</strong>g decays to zero, small deviations of the slow variable result <strong>in</strong> large deviationsof the period of oscillation. Typically, the periods of fast oscillations of the two bursterscan slowly diverge from each other. As a result, spikes start synchronized and thende-synchronize dur<strong>in</strong>g the burst, as we <strong>in</strong>dicate <strong>in</strong> the figure.If the burst<strong>in</strong>g neuron is a resonator, i.e., it is of the “Hopf/*” or “subHopf/*” type,then both excitation and <strong>in</strong>hibition may evoke premature spik<strong>in</strong>g, as we have shown

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!