12.07.2015 Views

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

384 Burst<strong>in</strong>gaction potentials cut2 mV100 msFigure 9.46: The conductance noise destabilizes the focusequilibrium <strong>in</strong> a mesencephalic V neuron before subcriticalAndronov-Hopf bifurcation takes place, therebygiv<strong>in</strong>g an impression of a supercritical Andronov-Hopfbifurcation (data modified from Wu et al. 2001).types are def<strong>in</strong>ed for models of the fast-slow form (9.1) assum<strong>in</strong>g that the ratio of timescales, µ, is sufficiently small. Not all neurons can be described adequately by suchmodels, hence extend<strong>in</strong>g the classification to those neurons may be worthless. Typicalexample when the classification fails is the model of burst<strong>in</strong>g of the sensory process<strong>in</strong>gneuron <strong>in</strong> weakly electric fish, known as the “ghostburster” (Doiron et al. 2002) <strong>in</strong>which µ > 0.1.If a burst<strong>in</strong>g neuron can be described accurately by a model hav<strong>in</strong>g fast-slow form(9.1), then there is no problem to determ<strong>in</strong>e its topological type — just freeze theslow subsystem, i.e., set µ = 0, and f<strong>in</strong>d bifurcations of the fast subsystem treat<strong>in</strong>gu as a parameter. Software packages, such as XPPAUT, AUTO, or MATLAB basedMATCONT, are helpful <strong>in</strong> bifurcation analyses of such systems.What if a neuron has an apparent fast-slow dynamics but its model is not knownat present? To determ<strong>in</strong>e the types of bifurcations of the fast subsystem, we firstuse non-<strong>in</strong>vasive observations: presence or absence of fast subthreshold oscillations,changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>traburst (<strong>in</strong>terspike) frequency, changes <strong>in</strong> spike amplitudes, etc. Eachpiece of <strong>in</strong>formation excludes some bifurcations and narrows the set of possible typesof burst<strong>in</strong>g. Then, we can use <strong>in</strong>vasive methods, e.g., small perturbations, to test theco-existence of rest<strong>in</strong>g and spik<strong>in</strong>g states, and narrow down the choice of bifurcationsfurther. With some luck, we can exclude sufficiently many bifurcations and determ<strong>in</strong>eexactly the type of burst<strong>in</strong>g without even know<strong>in</strong>g the details of the mathematicalmodel that describes it.9.4.2 Integrators vs. ResonatorsA conspicuous feature of neuronal systems near Andronov-Hopf bifurcation, whethersubcritical or supercritical, is the existence of fast subthreshold oscillations of themembrane potential. Quite often, these oscillations are visible <strong>in</strong> record<strong>in</strong>gs of themembrane potential. If not, then they could be evoked by a brief small pulse ofcurrent. Apparently, a burst<strong>in</strong>g neuron exhibit<strong>in</strong>g such oscillations <strong>in</strong> the quiescentstate is either of the “Hopf/*” type of “subHopf/*” type, where the wildcard “*”denotes any appropriate bifurcation of the spik<strong>in</strong>g state. All such bursters are <strong>in</strong> thelower half of the table <strong>in</strong> Fig. 9.23.To discern whether the bifurcation is supercritical or subcritical, one needs to study

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!