12.07.2015 Views

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

374 Burst<strong>in</strong>gdepend<strong>in</strong>g on the type of the equilibrium. If the equilibrium of the slow subsystem isa stable node, then the canonical model has the form˙v = I + v 2 + u 1 − u 2 ,˙u 1 = −µ 1 u 1 ,˙u 2 = −µ 2 u 2 .(9.9)If the equilibrium of the slow subsystem is a stable focus, the canonical model has theform˙v = I + v 2 + u 1 ,˙u 1 = −µ 1 u 2 ,(9.10)˙u 2 = −µ 2 (u 2 − u 1 ) ,with µ 2 < 4µ 1 . In both cases, there is an after-spike resett<strong>in</strong>g:if v = +∞, then v ← −1, and (u 1 , u 2 ) ← (u 1 , u 2 ) + (d 1 , d 2 ).Similarly to (9.7), the variable v ∈ R is the re-scaled membrane potential of the neuron.The positive feedback variable u 1 ∈ R describes activation of slow amplify<strong>in</strong>g currentsor potential at a dendritic compartment, whereas the negative feedback variable u 2 ∈ Rdescribes activation of slow resonant currents. I, d 1 , d 2 , and µ 1 , µ 2 ≪ 1 are parameters.When µ 2 > 4µ 1 , the equilibrium of the slow subsystem <strong>in</strong> (9.10) is a stable node,so (9.10) can be transformed <strong>in</strong>to (9.9) by a l<strong>in</strong>ear change of slow variables. If d 1 = 0,then u 1 → 0 and (9.9) is equivalent to (9.7).Both canonical models above exhibit “circle/circle” slow-wave burst<strong>in</strong>g, as depicted<strong>in</strong> Fig. 9.35. When I > 0, the equilibrium of the slow subsystem is <strong>in</strong> the shadedarea correspond<strong>in</strong>g to spik<strong>in</strong>g dynamics of the fast subsystem. When the slow vector(u 1 , u 2 ) enters the shaded area, the fast subsystem fires spikes, prevents the vectorfrom converg<strong>in</strong>g to the equilibrium, and eventually pushes it out of the area. Whileoutside, the vector follows the curved trajectory of the l<strong>in</strong>ear slow subsystem and thenreenters the shaded area aga<strong>in</strong>. Such a slow wave oscillation corresponds to the thicklimit cycle attractor <strong>in</strong> Fig. 9.35, which looks remarkably similar to the one for theI Na,p +I K +I Na,slow +I K(M) -model <strong>in</strong> Fig. 9.33.9.3.3 subHopf/fold cycleWhen the rest<strong>in</strong>g state loses stability via subcritical Andronov-Hopf bifurcation, andthe spik<strong>in</strong>g state disappears via fold limit cycle bifurcation, the burster is said to be ofthe “subHopf/fold cycle” type depicted <strong>in</strong> Fig. 9.36. Because there is a co-existence ofrest<strong>in</strong>g and spik<strong>in</strong>g states, such burst<strong>in</strong>g usually occurs via a hysteresis loop with onlyone slow variable.This k<strong>in</strong>d of burst<strong>in</strong>g was one of the three basic types identified by R<strong>in</strong>zel (1987). Itwas called “elliptic” <strong>in</strong> earlier studies because the profile of oscillation of the membranepotential resembles ellipses, or at least half-ellipses; see Fig. 9.37. Rodent trigem<strong>in</strong>al<strong>in</strong>terneurons <strong>in</strong> Fig. 9.38, dorsal root ganglion and mesV neurons <strong>in</strong> Fig. 9.39 are all

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!