12.07.2015 Views

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Burst<strong>in</strong>g 373fast variable, v10864200s<strong>in</strong>spik<strong>in</strong>gunstableatollstablerest<strong>in</strong>gphase of slow oscillation,Figure 9.34: “Circle/circle” burst<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>the Ermentrout-Kopell canonical model(9.8) with r(ψ) = s<strong>in</strong> ψ and ω = 0.1.The fast variable fires spikes whiles<strong>in</strong> ψ > 0 and quiescent while s<strong>in</strong> ψ < 0.Shaded atoll is surrounded by theequilibria curves ± √ | s<strong>in</strong> ψ|. The fastsubsystem undergoes saddle-node on <strong>in</strong>variantcircle bifurcation when s<strong>in</strong> ψ = 0.Us<strong>in</strong>g the averag<strong>in</strong>g technique described above <strong>in</strong> Sect. 9.2.3, we can reduce the fourdimensionalI Na,p + I K + I Na,slow + I K(M) -model to a simpler, two-dimensional slowI Na,slow +I K(M) -subsystem of the form (9.4). Burst<strong>in</strong>g of the full model corresponds toa limit cycle attractor of the averaged slow subsystem depicted as a bold curve onthe (m slow , n slow ) plane <strong>in</strong> Fig. 9.33c. Superimposed is the projection of the burst<strong>in</strong>gsolution of the full system (th<strong>in</strong> wobbly curve). In Fig. 9.33d we project a fourdimensionalburst<strong>in</strong>g trajectory onto the three-dimensional subspace (V, m slow , n slow ).The I Na,p +I K +I Na,slow +I K(M) -model <strong>in</strong> Fig. 9.33 enjoys a remarkable property: Itgenerates slow-wave bursts even though its slow I Na,slow + I K(M) -subsystem consistsof two uncoupled equations, and hence cannot oscillate by itself! Another exampleof this phenomenon is presented <strong>in</strong> Ex. 12. Thus, the slow wave that drives the fastI Na,p +I K -subsystem through the two circle bifurcations is not autonomous: it needsa feedback from V . In particular, the oscillation would disappear <strong>in</strong> a voltage-clampexperiment, i.e., when the membrane potential is fixed.Now consider a “circle/circle” burster with a slow subsystem perform<strong>in</strong>g smallamplitudeoscillations so that the fast subsystem is always near the saddle-node on<strong>in</strong>variant circle bifurcation. If the slow subsystem has an autonomous limit cycle attractorthat exists without feedback from V , then such a burster can be reduced to theErmentrout-Kopell (1986) canonical model˙v = v 2 + r(ψ) , if v = +∞, then v = −1, (9.8)˙ψ = ω ,which was orig<strong>in</strong>ally written <strong>in</strong> the ϑ-form; see Ex. 13. Here, ψ is the phase of autonomousoscillation of the slow subsystem, ω ≈ 0 is the frequency of slow oscillation,and r(ψ) is a periodic function that changes sign and slowly drives the fast quadratic<strong>in</strong>tegrate-and-fire neuron (9.8) back and forth through the bifurcation, as we illustrate<strong>in</strong> Fig. 9.34.Alternatively, suppose that the slow subsystem cannot have susta<strong>in</strong>ed oscillationswithout the fast subsystem, i.e., the slow subsystem has a stable equilibrium if v isfixed. In Ex. 17 we prove that there is a piece-wise cont<strong>in</strong>uous change of variables thattransforms any such “circle/circle” burster <strong>in</strong>to one of the two canonical models below,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!