Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:
Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience: Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:
354 Burstingn-nullclinen slow =-0.03V-nullclinen slow =0.0033membrane potential, V (mV)0-20-40-60-80-0.030slow K + gating variable, n slow0.030.060.0900.5fast K + gating variable, n1saddlenodebifurcationn slow =0.03n slow =0.06n slow =0.066saddlehomoclinic orbitbifurcationspikingn slow =0.0910.8thresholdrestingVfastnn slow0.60.40.20fast K+ activation gate, n-80 -60 -40 -20 0membrane potential, V (mV)Figure 9.13: Bursting trajectory of the I Na,p +I K +I K(M) -model in three-dimensionalphase space and its slices n slow = const.
Bursting 355to the stable equilibrium corresponding to the resting state. This jumping correspondsto the termination of the active phase of bursting and transition to resting. While atrest, K + current deactivates, n slow decreases, and so on.Figure 9.13 presents the inner structure of the geometrical mechanism of burstingof the I Na,p +I K +I K(M) -model with parameters as in Fig. 9.4. Other values of theparameters can result in different geometrical mechanisms, summarized in Sect. 9.3.In all cases, our approach is the same: freeze the slow subsystem by setting µ = 0;analyze phase portraits of the fast subsystem treating the slow variable as a bifurcationparameter; then glue the phase portraits, let µ ≠ 0 but small, and see how the evolutionof the slow subsystem switches the fast subsystem between spiking and resting states.The method usually breaks down if µ is not small enough, because evolution of the“slow” variable starts to interfere with that of the fast variable. How small is smalldepends on the particulars of the equations describing bursting activity. One shouldworry when µ is greater than 0.1.9.2.3 AveragingWhat governs the evolution of the slow variable u? To study this question, we describea well-known and widely used method that reduces the fast-slow system (9.1) to its slowcomponent. In fact, we have already used this method in Chapters 3 and 4 to reducethe dimension of neuronal models via substitution m = m ∞ (V ). Using essentially thesame ideas, we take advantage of the two time scales in (9.1) and get rid of the fastsubsystem by means of a substitution x = x(u).When the neuron is resting, its membrane potential is at an equilibrium and allfast gating variables are at their steady-state values, so that x = x rest (u). Using thisfunction in the slow equation in (9.1) we obtain˙u = µg(x rest (u), u) (reduced slow subsystem) , (9.2)which can easily be studied using the geometrical methods presented in Chapters 3 or4.Let us illustrate all the steps involved using the I Na,p +I K +I K(M) -model with n slowbeing the gating variable of the slow K + M-current. First, we freeze the slow subsystem,i.e., set τ slow (V ) = ∞ so that µ = 1/τ slow = 0, and determine numerically the restingpotential V rest as a function of the slow variable n slow . The function V = V rest (n slow )is depicted in Fig. 9.14, top, and it coincides with the solid half-parabola in Fig. 9.13.Then, we use this function in the gating equation for the M-current to obtain (9.2)ṅ slow = (n ∞,slow (V rest (n slow )) − n slow )/τ slow (V rest (n slow )) = ḡ(n slow )depicted in Fig. 9.14, bottom. Notice that ḡ < 0, meaning that n slow decreases whilethe fast subsystem rests. The rate of decrease is fairly small when n slow ≈ 0.A similar method of reduction, with an extra step, can be used when the fastsubsystem fires spikes. Let x(t) = x spike (t, u) be a periodic function corresponding to
- Page 314 and 315: 304 Simple Models(a)dendriticspike2
- Page 316 and 317: 306 Simple Models(a)74 5 6 3210(b)C
- Page 318 and 319: 308 Simple Modelschattering neuron
- Page 320 and 321: 310 Simple ModelsLTS neuron (in vit
- Page 322 and 323: 312 Simple ModelsFS neuron (in vitr
- Page 324 and 325: 314 Simple Models(1) fast oscillati
- Page 326 and 327: 316 Simple Modelsthrough an appropr
- Page 328 and 329: 318 Simple Modelsthey are able to g
- Page 330 and 331: 320 Simple Modelsv r = −80 mV, an
- Page 332 and 333: 322 Simple Modelsshow in Fig. 7.36.
- Page 334 and 335: 324 Simple ModelsBibliographical No
- Page 336 and 337: 326 Simple ModelsExercises1. (Integ
- Page 338 and 339: 328 Simple Models17. [M.S.] Analyze
- Page 340 and 341: 330 Simple Modelsa35 mV350 msc-NAC
- Page 342 and 343: 332 Simple Modelsrat RTN neuronsimp
- Page 344 and 345: 334 Simple ModelsFigure 8.34: Class
- Page 346 and 347: 336 Simple Modelsspiny neuronlatenc
- Page 348 and 349: 338 Simple Models(a)stellate cellof
- Page 350 and 351: 340 Simple Modelsrat's mitral cell
- Page 352 and 353: 342 Bursting(a) cortical chattering
- Page 354 and 355: 344 Burstingmembranepotential (mV)-
- Page 356 and 357: 346 Burstingvoltage-gatedCa2+-gated
- Page 358 and 359: 348 Burstingslow dynamicsneuronvolt
- Page 360 and 361: 350 Burstingslow inactivation of in
- Page 362 and 363: 352 Bursting9.2.1 Fast-slow burster
- Page 366 and 367: 356 Bursting0maxmembrane potential,
- Page 368 and 369: 358 Bursting0membrane potential, V
- Page 370 and 371: 360 BurstingI=0I=4.5425 ms 25 mVI=5
- Page 372 and 373: 362 Burstingmembrane potential, V (
- Page 374 and 375: 364 Bursting9.3 ClassificationIn Fi
- Page 376 and 377: 366 Burstingbifurcation of spiking
- Page 378 and 379: 368 BurstingFigure 9.26: Putative
- Page 380 and 381: 370 Bursting108spikingslow variable
- Page 382 and 383: 372 Bursting(a)membrane potential,
- Page 384 and 385: 374 Burstingdepending on the type o
- Page 386 and 387: 376 BurstingsubcriticalAndronov-Hop
- Page 388 and 389: 378 Bursting(a)membrane potential,
- Page 390 and 391: spiking380 Burstingfoldbifurcations
- Page 392 and 393: 382 BurstingspikingsupercriticalAnd
- Page 394 and 395: 384 Burstingaction potentials cut2
- Page 396 and 397: 386 Bursting9.4.3 BistabilitySuppos
- Page 398 and 399: 388 BurstingFigure 9.49: The instan
- Page 400 and 401: esting390 Burstingspikesynchronizat
- Page 402 and 403: 392 BurstingReview of Important Con
- Page 404 and 405: 394 BurstingspikingrestingFigure 9.
- Page 406 and 407: 396 Bursting0-10membrane potential,
- Page 408 and 409: 398 Bursting0membrane potential, V
- Page 410 and 411: 400 BurstingFigure 9.61: A cycle-cy
- Page 412 and 413: 402 Bursting28. [Ph.D.] Develop an
Burst<strong>in</strong>g 355to the stable equilibrium correspond<strong>in</strong>g to the rest<strong>in</strong>g state. This jump<strong>in</strong>g correspondsto the term<strong>in</strong>ation of the active phase of burst<strong>in</strong>g and transition to rest<strong>in</strong>g. While atrest, K + current deactivates, n slow decreases, and so on.Figure 9.13 presents the <strong>in</strong>ner structure of the geometrical mechanism of burst<strong>in</strong>gof the I Na,p +I K +I K(M) -model with parameters as <strong>in</strong> Fig. 9.4. Other values of theparameters can result <strong>in</strong> different geometrical mechanisms, summarized <strong>in</strong> Sect. 9.3.In all cases, our approach is the same: freeze the slow subsystem by sett<strong>in</strong>g µ = 0;analyze phase portraits of the fast subsystem treat<strong>in</strong>g the slow variable as a bifurcationparameter; then glue the phase portraits, let µ ≠ 0 but small, and see how the evolutionof the slow subsystem switches the fast subsystem between spik<strong>in</strong>g and rest<strong>in</strong>g states.The method usually breaks down if µ is not small enough, because evolution of the“slow” variable starts to <strong>in</strong>terfere with that of the fast variable. How small is smalldepends on the particulars of the equations describ<strong>in</strong>g burst<strong>in</strong>g activity. One shouldworry when µ is greater than 0.1.9.2.3 Averag<strong>in</strong>gWhat governs the evolution of the slow variable u? To study this question, we describea well-known and widely used method that reduces the fast-slow system (9.1) to its slowcomponent. In fact, we have already used this method <strong>in</strong> Chapters 3 and 4 to reducethe dimension of neuronal models via substitution m = m ∞ (V ). Us<strong>in</strong>g essentially thesame ideas, we take advantage of the two time scales <strong>in</strong> (9.1) and get rid of the fastsubsystem by means of a substitution x = x(u).When the neuron is rest<strong>in</strong>g, its membrane potential is at an equilibrium and allfast gat<strong>in</strong>g variables are at their steady-state values, so that x = x rest (u). Us<strong>in</strong>g thisfunction <strong>in</strong> the slow equation <strong>in</strong> (9.1) we obta<strong>in</strong>˙u = µg(x rest (u), u) (reduced slow subsystem) , (9.2)which can easily be studied us<strong>in</strong>g the geometrical methods presented <strong>in</strong> Chapters 3 or4.Let us illustrate all the steps <strong>in</strong>volved us<strong>in</strong>g the I Na,p +I K +I K(M) -model with n slowbe<strong>in</strong>g the gat<strong>in</strong>g variable of the slow K + M-current. First, we freeze the slow subsystem,i.e., set τ slow (V ) = ∞ so that µ = 1/τ slow = 0, and determ<strong>in</strong>e numerically the rest<strong>in</strong>gpotential V rest as a function of the slow variable n slow . The function V = V rest (n slow )is depicted <strong>in</strong> Fig. 9.14, top, and it co<strong>in</strong>cides with the solid half-parabola <strong>in</strong> Fig. 9.13.Then, we use this function <strong>in</strong> the gat<strong>in</strong>g equation for the M-current to obta<strong>in</strong> (9.2)ṅ slow = (n ∞,slow (V rest (n slow )) − n slow )/τ slow (V rest (n slow )) = ḡ(n slow )depicted <strong>in</strong> Fig. 9.14, bottom. Notice that ḡ < 0, mean<strong>in</strong>g that n slow decreases whilethe fast subsystem rests. The rate of decrease is fairly small when n slow ≈ 0.A similar method of reduction, with an extra step, can be used when the fastsubsystem fires spikes. Let x(t) = x spike (t, u) be a periodic function correspond<strong>in</strong>g to