Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience: Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

ib.cnea.gov.ar
from ib.cnea.gov.ar More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

354 Burstingn-nullclinen slow =-0.03V-nullclinen slow =0.0033membrane potential, V (mV)0-20-40-60-80-0.030slow K + gating variable, n slow0.030.060.0900.5fast K + gating variable, n1saddlenodebifurcationn slow =0.03n slow =0.06n slow =0.066saddlehomoclinic orbitbifurcationspikingn slow =0.0910.8thresholdrestingVfastnn slow0.60.40.20fast K+ activation gate, n-80 -60 -40 -20 0membrane potential, V (mV)Figure 9.13: Bursting trajectory of the I Na,p +I K +I K(M) -model in three-dimensionalphase space and its slices n slow = const.

Bursting 355to the stable equilibrium corresponding to the resting state. This jumping correspondsto the termination of the active phase of bursting and transition to resting. While atrest, K + current deactivates, n slow decreases, and so on.Figure 9.13 presents the inner structure of the geometrical mechanism of burstingof the I Na,p +I K +I K(M) -model with parameters as in Fig. 9.4. Other values of theparameters can result in different geometrical mechanisms, summarized in Sect. 9.3.In all cases, our approach is the same: freeze the slow subsystem by setting µ = 0;analyze phase portraits of the fast subsystem treating the slow variable as a bifurcationparameter; then glue the phase portraits, let µ ≠ 0 but small, and see how the evolutionof the slow subsystem switches the fast subsystem between spiking and resting states.The method usually breaks down if µ is not small enough, because evolution of the“slow” variable starts to interfere with that of the fast variable. How small is smalldepends on the particulars of the equations describing bursting activity. One shouldworry when µ is greater than 0.1.9.2.3 AveragingWhat governs the evolution of the slow variable u? To study this question, we describea well-known and widely used method that reduces the fast-slow system (9.1) to its slowcomponent. In fact, we have already used this method in Chapters 3 and 4 to reducethe dimension of neuronal models via substitution m = m ∞ (V ). Using essentially thesame ideas, we take advantage of the two time scales in (9.1) and get rid of the fastsubsystem by means of a substitution x = x(u).When the neuron is resting, its membrane potential is at an equilibrium and allfast gating variables are at their steady-state values, so that x = x rest (u). Using thisfunction in the slow equation in (9.1) we obtain˙u = µg(x rest (u), u) (reduced slow subsystem) , (9.2)which can easily be studied using the geometrical methods presented in Chapters 3 or4.Let us illustrate all the steps involved using the I Na,p +I K +I K(M) -model with n slowbeing the gating variable of the slow K + M-current. First, we freeze the slow subsystem,i.e., set τ slow (V ) = ∞ so that µ = 1/τ slow = 0, and determine numerically the restingpotential V rest as a function of the slow variable n slow . The function V = V rest (n slow )is depicted in Fig. 9.14, top, and it coincides with the solid half-parabola in Fig. 9.13.Then, we use this function in the gating equation for the M-current to obtain (9.2)ṅ slow = (n ∞,slow (V rest (n slow )) − n slow )/τ slow (V rest (n slow )) = ḡ(n slow )depicted in Fig. 9.14, bottom. Notice that ḡ < 0, meaning that n slow decreases whilethe fast subsystem rests. The rate of decrease is fairly small when n slow ≈ 0.A similar method of reduction, with an extra step, can be used when the fastsubsystem fires spikes. Let x(t) = x spike (t, u) be a periodic function corresponding to

Burst<strong>in</strong>g 355to the stable equilibrium correspond<strong>in</strong>g to the rest<strong>in</strong>g state. This jump<strong>in</strong>g correspondsto the term<strong>in</strong>ation of the active phase of burst<strong>in</strong>g and transition to rest<strong>in</strong>g. While atrest, K + current deactivates, n slow decreases, and so on.Figure 9.13 presents the <strong>in</strong>ner structure of the geometrical mechanism of burst<strong>in</strong>gof the I Na,p +I K +I K(M) -model with parameters as <strong>in</strong> Fig. 9.4. Other values of theparameters can result <strong>in</strong> different geometrical mechanisms, summarized <strong>in</strong> Sect. 9.3.In all cases, our approach is the same: freeze the slow subsystem by sett<strong>in</strong>g µ = 0;analyze phase portraits of the fast subsystem treat<strong>in</strong>g the slow variable as a bifurcationparameter; then glue the phase portraits, let µ ≠ 0 but small, and see how the evolutionof the slow subsystem switches the fast subsystem between spik<strong>in</strong>g and rest<strong>in</strong>g states.The method usually breaks down if µ is not small enough, because evolution of the“slow” variable starts to <strong>in</strong>terfere with that of the fast variable. How small is smalldepends on the particulars of the equations describ<strong>in</strong>g burst<strong>in</strong>g activity. One shouldworry when µ is greater than 0.1.9.2.3 Averag<strong>in</strong>gWhat governs the evolution of the slow variable u? To study this question, we describea well-known and widely used method that reduces the fast-slow system (9.1) to its slowcomponent. In fact, we have already used this method <strong>in</strong> Chapters 3 and 4 to reducethe dimension of neuronal models via substitution m = m ∞ (V ). Us<strong>in</strong>g essentially thesame ideas, we take advantage of the two time scales <strong>in</strong> (9.1) and get rid of the fastsubsystem by means of a substitution x = x(u).When the neuron is rest<strong>in</strong>g, its membrane potential is at an equilibrium and allfast gat<strong>in</strong>g variables are at their steady-state values, so that x = x rest (u). Us<strong>in</strong>g thisfunction <strong>in</strong> the slow equation <strong>in</strong> (9.1) we obta<strong>in</strong>˙u = µg(x rest (u), u) (reduced slow subsystem) , (9.2)which can easily be studied us<strong>in</strong>g the geometrical methods presented <strong>in</strong> Chapters 3 or4.Let us illustrate all the steps <strong>in</strong>volved us<strong>in</strong>g the I Na,p +I K +I K(M) -model with n slowbe<strong>in</strong>g the gat<strong>in</strong>g variable of the slow K + M-current. First, we freeze the slow subsystem,i.e., set τ slow (V ) = ∞ so that µ = 1/τ slow = 0, and determ<strong>in</strong>e numerically the rest<strong>in</strong>gpotential V rest as a function of the slow variable n slow . The function V = V rest (n slow )is depicted <strong>in</strong> Fig. 9.14, top, and it co<strong>in</strong>cides with the solid half-parabola <strong>in</strong> Fig. 9.13.Then, we use this function <strong>in</strong> the gat<strong>in</strong>g equation for the M-current to obta<strong>in</strong> (9.2)ṅ slow = (n ∞,slow (V rest (n slow )) − n slow )/τ slow (V rest (n slow )) = ḡ(n slow )depicted <strong>in</strong> Fig. 9.14, bottom. Notice that ḡ < 0, mean<strong>in</strong>g that n slow decreases whilethe fast subsystem rests. The rate of decrease is fairly small when n slow ≈ 0.A similar method of reduction, with an extra step, can be used when the fastsubsystem fires spikes. Let x(t) = x spike (t, u) be a periodic function correspond<strong>in</strong>g to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!