12.07.2015 Views

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Simple Models 319The classification of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons <strong>in</strong>to five different classesdoes not imply a fundamental difference <strong>in</strong> the ionic mechanism of spike-generation, butonly a quantitative difference. This follows from the observation that pharmacologicalmanipulations can gradually and reversibly transform an NB neuron <strong>in</strong>to LTB IIIneuron and visa-versa by elevat<strong>in</strong>g the extracellular concentration of K + (Jensen et al.1994), reduc<strong>in</strong>g extracellular Ca 2+ (Su et al. 2001), or block<strong>in</strong>g K + M-current (Yueand Yaari 2004), or manipulat<strong>in</strong>g Ca 2+ current dynamics <strong>in</strong> apical dendrites (Mageeand Carruth 1999).In Fig. 8.35 we modify the simple model for neocortical RS neuron to reproducefir<strong>in</strong>g patterns of hippocampal pyramidal cells. To get the cont<strong>in</strong>uum of responses, fromNB to LTB II, we fix all the parameters and vary only the after-spike reset parameterc <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>crement of 5 mV, and the parameter d. These phenomenological parametersdescribe the effect of high-threshold <strong>in</strong>ward and outward currents activated dur<strong>in</strong>g eachspike and affect<strong>in</strong>g the after-spike behavior. Increas<strong>in</strong>g c corresponds to up-regulat<strong>in</strong>gslow I Na,p or down-regulat<strong>in</strong>g slow K + currents, which leads to transition from NBto LTB III <strong>in</strong> the CA1 slice (Su et al. 2001) and <strong>in</strong> the simple model <strong>in</strong> Fig. 8.35.Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, the same procedure results <strong>in</strong> transitions from RS to IB and possibly toCH classes <strong>in</strong> neocortical pyramidal neurons (Izhikevich 2003). This is consistent withthe observation by Steriade (2004) that many neocortical neurons can change theirfir<strong>in</strong>g classes <strong>in</strong> vivo depend<strong>in</strong>g on the state of the bra<strong>in</strong>.8.4.2 Sp<strong>in</strong>y projection neurons of neostriatum and basal gangliaSp<strong>in</strong>y projection neurons, the major class of neurons <strong>in</strong> neostriatum and basal ganglia,display a prom<strong>in</strong>ent bistable behavior <strong>in</strong> vivo shown <strong>in</strong> Fig. 8.36 (Wilson and Groves1981, Wilson 1993): They shift the membrane potential from hyperpolarized to depolarizedstates <strong>in</strong> response to synchronous excitatory synaptic <strong>in</strong>put from cortex and/orthalamus. In vitro studies of such neurons reveal a slowly <strong>in</strong>activat<strong>in</strong>g K + A-current,which is believed to be responsible for the ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of the up- and down-states, <strong>in</strong>addition to the synaptic <strong>in</strong>put. Indeed, the K + current is completely de<strong>in</strong>activated atthe hyperpolarized potentials (down-states), and reduces the response of the neuronto any synaptic <strong>in</strong>put. In contrast, prolonged depolarization (up-state) <strong>in</strong>activates thecurrent and makes the neuron more excitable and ready to fire spikes.The most remarkable feature of neostriatal sp<strong>in</strong>y neurons is depicted <strong>in</strong> Fig. 8.37.In response to depolariz<strong>in</strong>g current pulses, the neurons display a prom<strong>in</strong>ent slowlydepolariz<strong>in</strong>g (ramp) potential, and hence long latency to spike discharge (Nisenbaumet al. 1994). The ramp is mostly due to the slow <strong>in</strong>activation of K + A-current andslow charg<strong>in</strong>g of the dendritic tree. The delay to spike could be as long as 1 sec, butthe subsequent spike tra<strong>in</strong> has a shorter relatively constant period that depends on themagnitude of the <strong>in</strong>jected current.Let us use the simple model (8.5, 8.6) to simulate the responses of sp<strong>in</strong>y neuronsto current pulses. The rest<strong>in</strong>g membrane potential of the neuron <strong>in</strong> Fig. 8.37 is around

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!