12.07.2015 Views

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

288 Simple Models<strong>in</strong>tegrate-and-fire modelsimple modelspike cutoffspikesare drawnby handspikes aregeneratedthresholdrest<strong>in</strong>gresetthreshold ?rest<strong>in</strong>greset<strong>in</strong>put<strong>in</strong>putFigure 8.7: Voltage reset <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tegrate-and-fire model and <strong>in</strong> the simple model.is voltage-dependent, e.g., k = 0.7 for v ≤ v t and k = 7 for v > v t , or by us<strong>in</strong>gthe modification of the simple model presented <strong>in</strong> Ex. 13 and Ex. 17. The seconddiscrepancy results from the <strong>in</strong>stantaneous after-spike resett<strong>in</strong>g, and it is of a lesserimportance because it does not affect the decision whether or when to fire. However,the slope of the downstroke may become important <strong>in</strong> studies of gap-junction-coupledspik<strong>in</strong>g neurons.The phase portrait of the simple model is depicted <strong>in</strong> Fig. 8.6c. Injection of thestep of dc-current I = 70 pA shifts the v-nullcl<strong>in</strong>e (square parabola) up and makesthe rest<strong>in</strong>g state, denoted by a black square, disappear. The trajectory approaches thespik<strong>in</strong>g limit cycle attractor, and when it crosses the cutoff vertical l<strong>in</strong>e v peak = 35 mV,it is reset to the white square, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> periodic spik<strong>in</strong>g behavior. Notice the slowafterhyperpolarization (AHP) follow<strong>in</strong>g the reset that is due to the dynamics of therecovery variable u. Depend<strong>in</strong>g on the parameters, the model can have other types ofphase portraits, spik<strong>in</strong>g, and burst<strong>in</strong>g behavior, as we demonstrate <strong>in</strong> the rest of thechapter.In Fig. 8.7 we illustrate the difference between the <strong>in</strong>tegrate-and-fire neuron and thesimple model. The <strong>in</strong>tegrate-and-fire model is said to fire spikes when the membranepotential reaches a preset threshold value. The potential is reset to a new value, andthe spikes are drawn by hand. In contrast, the simple model generates the up-strokeof the spike due to the <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic (regenerative) properties of the voltage equation. Thevoltage reset occurs not at the threshold, but at the peak of the spike. In fact, thefir<strong>in</strong>g threshold <strong>in</strong> the simple model is not a parameter, but a property of the bifurcationmechanism of excitability. Depend<strong>in</strong>g on the bifurcation of equilibrium, the model maynot even have a well-def<strong>in</strong>ed threshold, similarly to conductance-based models.When implement<strong>in</strong>g numerically the voltage reset, whether at the threshold or thepeak of the spike, one needs to be aware of the numerical errors, which translate <strong>in</strong>tothe errors of spike tim<strong>in</strong>g. These errors are <strong>in</strong>versely proportional to the slope of thevoltage variable at the reset value. The slope is small <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tegrate-and-fire model, so

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!